To G7 at the summit

Dear Ms. Palmerova:

On behalf of the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, I would like to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence regarding Canada’s climate strategy.

Please be assured that your comments have been carefully reviewed. As this issue is of particular interest to the Honourable Catherine McKenna, Minister of Environment and Climate Change, I have taken the liberty of forwarding your email to her. I am certain that Minister McKenna will wish to give your views every consideration.

Thank you for writing to the Prime Minister.

M. Bredeson
Executive Correspondence Officer
for the Prime Minister’s Office
Agent de correspondance
de la haute direction pour le Cabinet du Premier ministre

>   From : Dagmar Palmer      Received : 15  May  2017 09:34:41 AM   >>>

>>>   Subject : G7 Summit in Taormina   >>>>

Dear G7 Leader,

The whole world is going to watch your conscience and political/diplomatic skills in addressing the critical issues of so-called Climate change in G7+1 Summit in Taormina.

I would like to ask you in advance, as a citizen of this planet, how you can expect to come to any productive agreement unless you finally admit, that Carbon dioxide is a scam to cover up the global scientific military exploitation of the atmospheric space and highly profitable weather market economy where only very few dominant countries benefit locally in short term at the expense of the rest of the planet itself and its 7 billions habitants?
Scientists and politicians with conscience will never agree with such scenario.

So how can the 43.meeting have any significance but a diplomatic social gathering in  beautiful surroundings unless the truth is revealed?

You as a representative of your country, elected by your people,  have a duty to truly inform your citizens about the issues, profoundly affecting their lives,  lives of other nations, as well as the Earth itself on which wellbeing depends the existence of the whole life on Earth.
So please act accordingly.

Yours faithfully

Dagmar Palmerova

To the spiritual centres across the planet


His Holiness The Pope The Apostolic Palace 00120 Vatican City

Your Holiness,

I have decided to contact major spiritual centres across the planet  regarding certain taboos, which should be addressed to all the people but are not so.

As an old person  who finally  understands there are two purposes of life, one to serve nature and the other one to raise above it which is our birthright,  I want to express my worry that we, in our state full of arrogance and  vanity, are on the way to destroy that possibility not just for ourselves but for the future generations as well, if we do not change the planned course of  life.

Do you know the science has come to the point of recognizing there is no death as such? Continue reading “To the spiritual centres across the planet”

“Never will he understand the sufferings of another  who has not experienced them himself though he may have divine Reason and the nature of a genuine Devil”

Mulla Nassr Eddin

Happy Easter

I have no idea where you all are going, probably to the Moon.

I am tired, bored with all this utter stupidity around the world, where no one is allowed to say that black is black and white is white, but is allowed to state that black is white and vice versa.

If you want to play this game, fine, but why then  you get on high  by titillating the “animal”?  Are you  so cowardly to stand up for your own truth, which is right above your head and in front of your eyes? The psychotronic weapons are already  in your neighborhood, the whole military systems are set up to read your minds and alternate your emotions, you are doing it to me publicly so how can you imagine it is just my problem? If the Alphabets allow you to do it, cannot you comprehend that you are the targets as well?

Like millions of others, I am trying to explain  that humanity is in danger. That you are not told the most advanced  discoveries in neuroscience, which would certainly re-evaluate  many scientific, religious and political approaches to our future.

The Defense Departments are due to tell you that their research centres are able and do separate the physical part of human body from our consciousness. The obvious implications concern the atheistic approach to science and religious approach to such discoveries. As these phenomenons have been achieved not by its own, proper internal development but through deaths and  immense sufferings of countless human beings around the world, one cannot leave out the question of  our level of being. If it’s so far below the animal’s, do we have rights to proceed with changing the very DNA structure of human kind and close thus ourselves the possibility of future exit from these horrors of amusing ourselves by mutual killing and torturing?


Who is actually a real Christian?

“The majority of those present here call themselves Christians. Practically all are Christians in quotation marks. Let us examine this question like grown-up men.
Dr. X., are you a Christian? What do you think, should one love one’s neighbor or hate him? Who can love like a Christian? It follows that to be a Christian is impossible. Christianity includes many things; we have taken only one of them, to serve as an example. Can you love or hate someone to order?
Yet Christianity says precisely this, to love all men. But this is impossible. At the same time it is quite true that it is neces- sary to love. First one must be able, only then can one love. Unfortunately, with time, modern Christians have adopted the second half, to love, and lost view of the first, the religion which should have preceded it.

It would be very silly for God to demand from man what he cannot give.
Half of the world is Christian, the other half has other religions. For me, a sensible man, this makes no difference; they are the same as the Christian. Therefore it is possible to say that the whole world is Christian, the difference is only in name. And it has been Christian not only for one year but for thousands of years. There were Christians long before the ad- vent of Christianity. So common sense says to me: “For so many years men have been Christians—how can they be so foolish as to demand the impossible?”
But it is not like that. Things have not always been as they are now. Only recently have people forgotten the first half, and because of that have lost the capacity for being able. And so it became indeed impossible.
Let every one ask himself, simply and openly, whether he can love all men. If he has had a cup of coffee, he loves; if not, he does not love. How can that be called Christianity?

In the past not all men were called Christians. Some members of the same family were called Christians, others preChristians, still others were called non-Christians. So in one and the same family there could be the first, the second and the third. But now all call themselves Christians. It is naive, dishonest, unwise and despicable to wear this name without justification.

A Christian is a man who is able to fulfill the Commandments.
A man who is able to do all that is demanded of a Christian, both with his mind and his essence, is called a Christian without quotation marks.

A man who, in his mind, wishes to do all that is demanded of a Christian, but can do so only with his mind and not with his essence, is called pre-Christian.

And a man who can do nothing, even with his mind, is called a non- Christian.
Try to understand what I wish to convey by all this. Let your understanding be deeper and broader….”

From “Views from the Real World” G.I.Gurdjieff

Morality vs Conscience

Drops of wisdom from our ancestors:

Morality differs according to time, geography and opinion.

Conscience is something we get born with, all of us regardless of race, time, geography  and beyond opinion.  It is uncorrupted as it has been buried deeply in us. It can be reached ONLY by inner work on one’s negative emotions.

According to morality Mr Snowden and Mr.Assange can be considered either   traitors or   heroes.

According to conscience they are among so many  human beings, who see that world leaders are heading us on the road to the  utter slavery and try to stop the process  by the means available to them while there is still time.

According to morality the fact that the path to the utter slavery is literally covered by broken eggs can be seen as heroic necessity to make future omelets or   NAZI human experimentation resulting in unheard of suffering.

According to conscience our humanness is literally dying in this process as we are cutting ourselves off the source of life in order to become highly sophisticated immortal decimals for the price of our inevitable destruction as we won’t be able to fulfill either of our universal roles, which cannot be altered the way we want.