Damaging Alex Jones texts mistakenly sent to Sandy Hook family’s lawyers

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/aug/03/alex-jones-sandy-hook-shooting-defamation-trial

When I thought that 9/11 was most likely a hoax and said it to my teacher, he replied something like: you are probably right but if you told anyone, they would think you are completely mad.
I also thought that it was none of my business but that of America.
All available video recordings under the light of investigators strongly suggest that Sandy Hook or Christchurch are the hoaxes as well. How come the police are not able to explain to the courts and to the public the video evidence? How come Mr. Jones has been sued for reporting the hoax? Is it because he also reports the issues of global importance like directed energies, weather control, and inoculations?
If the society of the 21st century demands all details of the life of every bag of potatoes and has the means to obtain it, why does it not demand the satellite details of Sandy Hook?
And why am I not allowed to answer the questions the world still has after 13 years of days of my life so that we can move on to deal with the hot topics of biblical proportions?




Poland’s President Duda Compares the Warsaw 1944 Uprising against Nazi Occupation to the Battle of Mariupol

Source: Poland’s President Duda Compares the Warsaw 1944 Uprising against Nazi Occupation to the Battle of Mariupol

It’s like the weather.
Nothing can be changed with this level of political interaction. Not in the 21st century, when the new technologies and communications encompass the whole planet. Poland is not an atheistic country, nor is Ukraine or Russia. So please bring Christ in as a third force, de-symbolize the symbols so we can speak the same language and then it will be possible to end this utterly infantile, dangerous game.

“We are born as a self-developing organism as an experiment from the laboratory of the Sun”, not from the laboratory of the planetary agencies

dr. Maurice Nicoll Psychological commentaries vol.4 page 1237-8-9

Now understand we are born as self-developing organisms as an
experiment from the laboratory of the Sun. The Work says that if
this recent experiment is a failure, Man will be swept away, made very
small, like ants or bees, and another experiment in a self-developing
organism made on Earth. In this connection—this deep source of
negative emotion—there is the usual remark: “If there is a God, why
does he let things happen like war, etc. ?” What is the Work-answer?
The Work-answer is that Man’s level of being attracts his life. Wars,
cruelty, horrors, occur because Man is at the level of being that attracts
such things.

Now listen carefully. It is Man and his level of being that is the
cause of all such things and as long as Man does not try to awaken
and develop himself, such things will continue inevitably. I mean, Man
will attract them. We are made as self-developing organisms—that is,
we can work on ourselves and we can change our being—individually. If we
all changed, wars would cease. Study your being. You will find that
it is governed by negative emotions in the long run. As long as that is
the case, you cannot receive help from a higher level—that is, from
Higher Centres. If we are created as self-developing organisms and
make no attempt to use this freedom, why blame “God” for not interfering?

How could you be a self-developing organism if all the time
you were interfered with?


Do you see, therefore, that in the purification
of the Emotional Centre, which is necessary for contact with Higher
Centres—which represent in us the Conscious Circle of Humanity and
seek continually to help us, if we could only listen—we must get a right
form of thinking, a right mental idea, and so a right attitude as to
why things are as they are on this Earth. Gurdjieff, when once asked
if wars could be stopped, said: “Yes. But Man must change himself
so that certain vibrations do not make him violent. Wars are not
caused by Man. The sources are extra-terrestrial—such as two planets
crossing each other and causing a tension, a certain vibration. Mechanical mankind translates this vibration into violent emotions and
so war results. If Man became more conscious, he might, instead,
receive energy in the form of increased consciousness from these
vibrations.”
Now, to return briefly to the title of this note—namely, “Negative
and Positive Emotions”. All positive emotions come from Higher
Centres—and that is why we have to work on negative emotions.
Their quality is such that they have no opposites in them. That is,
they are Third Force, or, as the Gospels say, “Holy Spirit”. They are
“Yes and No”—not “Yes or No”. No one can create, call forth, make,
a positive emotion. So Mr. Ouspensky said: “Positive emotions come
as rewards.” That is, if you have privately, solitarily, and in the
loneliness not of your negative self but your own spirit, decided, made
a decision, to work on you yourself as regards some source of negative
emotion—if you, all alone, in this solitary place in yourself, full of the
integrity of your most Real I, have decided, made a decision, not to
identify or feed a particular negative emotion—-if, in short, you have
shut the door and entered into yourself (as it is said in Matthew:
“enter into thine inner chamber, and having shut thy door, pray to
thy Father, which is in secret”) then, “your Father, which seeth in
secret, will reward you” (Matt. vi.6). What is the reward? You will
taste positive emotion for a brief moment—something blessed—that is,
filled with such bliss that nothing of human love-hate emotions can be
compared with it. What we regard as positive emotions, feeling fine,
feeling fit, and on top of the world, self-admiration, etc., can turn in a
moment into negative emotion. Such emotions, such pleasant emotions,
1238
are not positive emotions; these never change into their opposites but
visit us and then withdraw.
But unless we work—really value this work on negative states,
struggle not to believe them, clear the Augaean Stables of the dung of
negative states, erect the God in ourselves, the individual spirit, to
fight as Hercules, who cleaned the Stables with the River of Truth,
then indeed we are cut off from all inner help and all the deep background that Higher Centres can begin to give, once we build up and
make the intermediary receptive instrument. False Personality will
prevent this. All humanity could be helped—if they made this receptive intermediary apparatus in their minds and hearts. Yes—but this
would, amongst other things, make False Personality and all its spurious
values so passive, so weak, that its influence would be negligible. Let
me remind you that when my wife and I went to Gurdjieff’s Institute
in France we were told: “Personality here has scarcely any right to
exist.” Well, reflect on all this for yourselves.

———————————————————————————————

https://consortiumnews.com/2022/07/07/weapons-industrys-investment-in-us-congress/

I must admit not every country publishes such details about their military finances, which will be of a similar kind everywhere, only of a different order.. .
Beelzebub says we are the only three brain beings in the entire Universe who have not understood the difference between the subjective planetary principle of reciprocal destruction and the objective universal principle of reciprocal maintenance. Apparently, there is no objective law for the subjective principle, only for the latter one.
Has Ai not found it yet?

Cybertorture

So far, the psychiatrists, neurologists and doctors label such reports as schizophrenic, delusional and force people on anti-psychotic medication
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/feb/21/un-rapporteur-warns-of-rise-of-cybertorture-to-bypass-physical-ban?fbclid=IwAR0mIvFNEpODW8KspG0XulW8MqkmzSSiO2gskQOgHicfxRjCTgKWV3vjlh0

https://www.ucc.ie/en/media/academic/law/vnuconference2020/26.PTSon_CYBER-TORTURE.docx

https://www.ucc.ie/en/media/academic/law/vnuconference2020/26.PTSon_CYBER-TORTURE.docx

The globalist food chain

I follow the food chain dramas very closely because of the esoteric aspect and impacts of such planetary moves. I will repeat again that the atmosphere contains certain amounts of active substances our science knows nothing about as it has no means yet to detect them. But the plants have the apparatuses that do detect them, absorb them, and thus pass them to us as nourishment not only to the physical bodies but also to the spiritual bodies. Through genetic modifications, even through the majority of drafting, the plants lose this ability and that is one of the aspects of how the spiritual degeneration of humanity proceeds. Quite tragic because totally unnecessary, just the lack of esoteric knowledge and a total misunderstanding of how the Universe operates, on almost every level of our civilization. To grow food on such a major scale in environmentally controlled conditions, that need electricity to operate them, without the “reflection” of the sun’s rays, we will gradually stop fulfilling our cosmic obligations and then we will end as in the Universe 25 experiment. That is why I try to persuade everyone including the major players who invest in such technologies that we need to bring back the CREATOR into the picture. On scientific verifiable bases. Let’s not forget one thing, the globalists are on the same ship as the rest of us. With the right knowledge, we can turn the ship in the right direction. How little faith we have in the LOVE of our CREATOR…..

From Atheist to Bible-believing Scientist

https://answersingenesis.org/world-religions/atheism/from-atheist-to-bible-believing-scientist/

“Simple bacteria can divide each 20 minutes and have some 2000 different proteins each containing 20 types of amino acids arranged in chains of say 200 amino acids. To be evolved via beneficial variants by single nucleotide mutations it should take, not 3 x 109 years (the expected time life existed on Earth) but some 1050 years. There is simply not enough time” (Vyskočil 2011).

Federal Register – Notice of Declaration Under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for Countermeasures Against Marburgvirus and/or Marburg Disease

The Secretary is issuing this Declaration pursuant to section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act to provide limited immunity for activities related to countermeasures against marburgvirus and/or Marburg disease.

DATES:

The Declaration is effective as of November 25, 2020.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/12/09/2020-26972/notice-of-declaration-under-the-public-readiness-and-emergency-preparedness-act-for-countermeasures

Click to access 2020-26972.pdf

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the Secretary) to issue a Declaration to provide liability immunity to certain individuals and entities (Covered Persons) against any claim of loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the manufacture, distribution, administration, or use of medical countermeasures (Covered Countermeasures), except for claims involving “willful misconduct” as defined in the PREP Act. This Declaration is subject to amendment as circumstances warrant.

The PREP Act was enacted on December 30, 2005, as Public Law 109-148, Division C, Section 2. It amended the Public Health Service (PHS) Act, adding Section 319F-3, which addresses liability immunity, and Section 319F-4, which creates a compensation program. These sections are codified at 42 U.S.C. 247d-6d and 42 U.S.C. 247d-6e, respectively.

The Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act (PAHPRA), Public Law 113-5, was enacted on March 13, 2013. Among other things, PAHPRA added sections 564A and 564B to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act to provide new authorities for the emergency use of approved products in emergencies and products held for emergency use. PAHPRA accordingly amended the definitions of “Covered Countermeasures” and “qualified pandemic and epidemic products” in Section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act (PREP Act provisions), so that products made available under these new FD&C Act authorities could be covered under PREP Act Declarations. PAHPRA also extended the definition of qualified pandemic and epidemic products that may be covered under a PREP Act Declaration to include products or technologies intended to enhance the use or effect of a drug, biological product, or device used against the pandemic or epidemic or against adverse events from these products. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, Public Law 116-136, enacted on March 27, 2020, amended section 319F-3(i)(1)(D) of the PHS Act, to create a new category of covered countermeasures to the PREP Act, namely, respiratory protective devices approved by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) under 42 CFR part 84, or any successor regulations, that the Secretary determines to be a priority for use during a public health emergency declared under section 319 of the PHS Act.

Marburg disease is a severe and often fatal illness in humans caused by marburgviruses, a group of filoviruses of the same family as ebolaviruses. Marburg disease is a highly virulent disease that causes hemorrhagic fever, with a case fatality rate of approximately 88 percent. Humans can become infected with marburgviruses, but it is largely unknown how marburgvirus transmits from its animal host to humans. For previous cases, unprotected contact with infected bat feces or aerosols was deemed the most likely route of infection. After the initial crossover of the virus from host animal to humans, transmission can occur through person-to-person contact. This may happen in several ways: Direct contact to droplets of body fluids from infected persons, or contact with equipment and other objects contaminated with infectious blood or tissues. The virus can spread between humans in close environments and through direct contact. A common route of infection is through nosocomial transmission.

Marburgvirus was first recognized in 1967, when outbreaks of hemorrhagic fever occurred simultaneously in laboratories in Marburg and Frankfurt, Germany and in Belgrade, Yugoslavia (now Serbia). Thirty-one people became ill, initially laboratory workers followed by several medical personnel and family members who had cared for them; seven deaths were reported. The first people infected had been exposed to imported African green monkeys or their tissues while conducting research.

From 1975-2014, there have been 10 reported outbreaks of Marburg disease, and all but one of these outbreaks had an apparent or suspected origin in Africa. These outbreaks have resulted in a total of 435 reported human cases of Marburg disease and 366 deaths among those reported cases; a case fatality rate of approximately of 84%. The recurrent but unpredictable and variable nature of Marburg disease outbreaks and the transmission profile makes marburgviruses a threat to the public health security of the American people, requiring vigilance and a continuing need for development of medical countermeasures. Similar to determinations and experiences with Ebola virus outbreaks, marburgvirus has been determined to have the potential to be a threat to US public health security.

Description of This Declaration by Section

Section I. Determination of Public Health Emergency or Credible Risk of Future Public Health Emergency

Before issuing a Declaration under the PREP Act, the Secretary is required to determine that a disease or other health condition or threat to health constitutes a public health emergency or that there is a credible risk that the disease, condition, or threat may constitute such an emergency.

This determination is separate and apart from the Declaration issued by the Secretary under Section 319 of the PHS Act that a disease or disorder presents a public health emergency or that a public health emergency, including significant outbreaks of infectious diseases or bioterrorist attacks, otherwise exists, or other Declarations or determinations made under other authorities of the Secretary. Accordingly, in Section I of the Declaration, the Secretary determines that marburgviruses and Marburg disease are a credible risk such that Marburg disease or marburgviruses may in the future constitute a public health emergency.

Section II. Factors Considered by the Secretary

In deciding whether and under what circumstances to issue a Declaration with respect to a Covered Countermeasure, the Secretary must consider the desirability of encouraging the design, development, clinical testing or investigation, manufacture, labeling, distribution, formulation, packaging, marketing, promotion, sale, purchase, donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration, licensing, and use of the countermeasure. In Section II of the Declaration, the Secretary states that he has considered these factors.

Section III. Activities Covered by This Declaration Under the PREP Act’s Liability Immunity

The Secretary must delineate the activities for which the PREP Act’s liability immunity is in effect. These activities may include, under conditions as the Secretary may specify, the manufacture, testing, development, distribution, administration, or use of one or more Covered Countermeasures (Recommended Activities). In Section III of the Declaration, the Secretary sets out the activities for which the immunity is in effect.

Section IV. Limited Immunity

The Secretary must also state that liability protections available under the PREP Act are in effect with respect to the Recommended Activities. These liability protections provide that, “[s]ubject to other provisions of [the PREP Act], a covered person shall be immune from suit and liability under federal and state law with respect to all claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or use by an individual of a covered countermeasure if a Declaration has been issued with respect to such countermeasure.” In Section IV of the Declaration, the Secretary states that liability protections are in effect with respect to the Recommended Activities.

Section V. Covered Persons

The PREP Act’s liability immunity applies to “Covered Persons” with respect to administration or use of a Covered Countermeasure. The term “Covered Persons” has a specific meaning and is defined in the PREP Act to include manufacturers, distributors, program planners, and qualified persons, and their officials, agents, and employees, and the United States. The PREP Act further defines the terms “manufacturer,” “distributor,” “program planner,” and “qualified person” as described below.

A manufacturer includes a contractor or subcontractor of a manufacturer; a supplier or licenser of any product, intellectual property, service, research tool or component or other article used in the design, development, clinical testing, investigation or manufacturing of a Covered Countermeasure; and any or all the parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, successors, and assigns of a manufacturer.

A distributor means a person or entity engaged in the distribution of drugs, biologics, or devices, including but not limited to: Manufacturers; re-packers; common carriers; contract carriers; air carriers; own-label distributors; private-label distributors; jobbers; brokers; warehouses and wholesale drug warehouses; independent wholesale drug traders; and retail pharmacies.

A program planner means a state or local government, including an Indian tribe; a person employed by the state or local government; or other person who supervises or administers a program with respect to the administration, dispensing, distribution, provision, or use of a Covered Countermeasure, including a person who establishes requirements, provides policy guidance, or supplies technical or scientific advice or assistance or provides a facility to administer or use a Covered Countermeasure in accordance with the Secretary’s Declaration. Under this definition, a private sector employer or community group or other “person” can be a program planner when it carries out the described activities.

A qualified person means a licensed health professional or other individual authorized to prescribe, administer, or dispense Covered Countermeasures under the law of the state in which the Covered Countermeasure was prescribed, administered, or dispensed; or a person within a category of persons identified as qualified in the Secretary’s Declaration. Under this definition, the Secretary can describe in the Declaration other qualified persons, such as volunteers, who are Covered Persons. Section V describes other qualified persons covered by this Declaration. The PREP Act also defines the word “person” as used in the Act: A person includes an individual, partnership, corporation, association, entity, or public or private corporation, including a federal, state, or local government agency or department.

Section V of the Declaration describes Covered Persons, including Qualified Persons. The Declaration includes all persons and entities defined as Covered Persons under the PREP Act.

Section VI. Covered Countermeasures

As noted above, Section III of the Declaration describes the activities (referred to as “Recommended Activities”) for which liability immunity is in effect. Section VI of the Declaration identifies the Covered Countermeasures for which the Secretary has recommended such activities. The PREP Act states that a “Covered Countermeasure” must be a “qualified pandemic or epidemic product,” or a “security countermeasure,” as described immediately below; a drug, biological product or device authorized for emergency use in accordance with Sections 564, 564A, or 564B of the FD&C Act; or respiratory protective devices approved by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) under 42 CFR part 84, or any successor regulations, that the Secretary determines to be a priority for use during a public health emergency declared under section 319 of the PHS Act.

A qualified pandemic or epidemic product means a drug or device, as defined in the FD&C Act or a biological product, as defined in the PHS Act that is (i) Manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure a pandemic or epidemic or limit the harm such a pandemic or epidemic might otherwise cause; (ii) manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed, or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by such a drug, biological product, or device; (iii) or a product or technology intended to enhance the use or effect of such a drug, biological product, or device.

A security countermeasure is a drug or device, as defined in the FD&C Act or a biological product, as defined in the PHS Act that (i)(a) The Secretary determines to be a priority to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, or treat harm from any biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear agent identified as a material threat by the Secretary of Homeland Security, or (b) to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, or treat harm from a condition that may result in adverse health consequences or death and may be caused by administering a drug, biological product, or device against such an agent; and (ii) is determined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services to be a necessary countermeasure to protect public health.

To be a Covered Countermeasure, qualified pandemic or epidemic products or security countermeasures also must be approved or cleared under the FD&C Act; approved by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) under 42 CFR part 84, or any successor regulations, that the Secretary determines to be a priority for use during a public health emergency declared under section 319 of the PHS Act; licensed under the PHS Act; or authorized for emergency use under Sections 564, 564A, or 564B of the FD&C Act.

A qualified pandemic or epidemic product also may be a Covered Countermeasure when it is subject to an exemption (that is, it is permitted to be used under an Investigational Drug Application or an Investigational Device Exemption) under the FD&C Act and is the object of research for possible use for diagnosis, mitigation, prevention, treatment, or cure, or to limit harm of a pandemic or epidemic or serious or life-threatening condition caused by such a drug or device.

A security countermeasure also may be a Covered Countermeasure if it may reasonably be determined to qualify for approval or licensing within 10 years after the Department’s determination that procurement of the countermeasure is appropriate.

Section VI lists countermeasures against marburgvirus and/or Marburg disease that are Covered Countermeasures under this declaration.

Section VI also refers to the statutory definitions of Covered Countermeasures to make clear that these statutory definitions limit the scope of Covered Countermeasures. Specifically, the Declaration notes that Covered Countermeasures must be “qualified pandemic or epidemic products,” or “security countermeasures,” or drugs, biological products, respiratory protective devices, or devices authorized for investigational or emergency use, as those terms are defined in the PREP Act, the FD&C Act, and the Public Health Service Act.

Section VII. Limitations on Distribution

The Secretary may specify that liability immunity is in effect only to Covered Countermeasures obtained through a particular means of distribution. The Declaration states that liability immunity is afforded to Covered Persons for Recommended Activities related to (a) Present or future federal contracts, cooperative agreements, grants, other transactions, interagency agreements, or memoranda of understanding or other federal agreements; or (b) Activities authorized in accordance with the public health and medical response of the Authority Having Jurisdiction to prescribe, administer, deliver, distribute, or dispense the Covered Countermeasures following a Declaration of an emergency.

Section VII defines the terms “Authority Having Jurisdiction” and “Declaration of an emergency.” We have specified in the definition that Authorities having jurisdiction include federal, state, local, and tribal authorities and institutions or organizations acting on behalf of those governmental entities.

For governmental program planners only, liability immunity is afforded only to the extent they obtain Covered Countermeasures through voluntary means, such as (1) donation; (2) commercial sale; (3) deployment of Covered Countermeasures from federal stockpiles; or (4) deployment of donated, purchased, or otherwise voluntarily obtained Covered Countermeasures from state, local, or private stockpiles. This last limitation on distribution is intended to deter program planners that are government entities from seizing privately held stockpiles of Covered Countermeasures. It does not apply to any other Covered Persons, including other program planners who are not government entities.

Section VIII. Category of Disease, Health Condition, or Threat

The Secretary must identify in the Declaration, for each Covered Countermeasure, the categories of diseases, health conditions, or threats to health for which the Secretary recommends the administration or use of the countermeasure. In Section VIII of the Declaration, the Secretary states that the disease threat for which he recommends administration or use of the Covered Countermeasures is Marburg disease caused by marburgviruses or virus mutating therefrom.

Section IX. Administration of Covered Countermeasures

The PREP Act does not explicitly define the term “administration” but does assign the Secretary the responsibility to provide relevant conditions in the Declaration. In Section IX of the Declaration, the Secretary defines “Administration of a Covered Countermeasure,” as follows:

Administration of a Covered Countermeasure means physical provision of the countermeasures to recipients, or activities and decisions directly relating to public and private delivery, distribution, and dispensing of the countermeasures to recipients; management and operation of countermeasure programs; or management and operation of locations for purpose of distributing and dispensing countermeasures.

The definition of “administration” extends only to physical provision of a countermeasure to a recipient, such as vaccination or handing drugs to patients, and to activities related to management and operation of programs and locations for providing countermeasures to recipients, such as decisions and actions involving security and queuing, but only insofar as those activities directly relate to the countermeasure activities. Claims for which Covered Persons are provided immunity under the Act are losses caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or use by an individual of a Covered Countermeasure consistent with the terms of a Declaration issued under the Act. Under the definition, these liability claims are precluded if they allege an injury caused by a countermeasure, or if the claims are due to manufacture, delivery, distribution, dispensing, or management and operation of countermeasure programs at distribution and dispensing sites.

Thus, it is the Secretary’s interpretation that, when a Declaration is in effect, the Act precludes, for example, liability claims alleging negligence by a manufacturer in creating a vaccine, or negligence by a health care provider in prescribing the wrong dose, absent willful misconduct. Likewise, the Act precludes a liability claim relating to the management and operation of a countermeasure distribution program or site, such as a slip-and-fall injury or vehicle collision by a recipient receiving a countermeasure at a retail store serving as an administration or dispensing location that alleges, for example, lax security or chaotic crowd control. However, a liability claim alleging an injury occurring at the site that was not directly related to the countermeasure activities is not covered, such as a slip and fall with no direct connection to the countermeasure’s administration or use. In each case, whether immunity is applicable will depend on the particular facts and circumstances.

Section X. Population

The Secretary must identify, for each Covered Countermeasure specified in a Declaration, the population or populations of individuals for which liability immunity is in effect with respect to administration or use of the countermeasure. Section X of the Declaration identifies which individuals should use the countermeasure or to whom the countermeasure should be administered—in short, those who should be vaccinated or take a drug or other countermeasure. Section X provides that the population includes “any individual who uses or who is administered a Covered Countermeasure in accordance with the Declaration.”

It should be noted that under the PREP Act, liability protection extends beyond the Population specified in the Declaration. Specifically, liability immunity is afforded (1) To manufacturers and distributors without regard to whether the countermeasure is used by or administered to this population, and (2) to program planners and qualified persons when the countermeasure is either used by or administered to this population or the program planner or qualified person reasonably could have believed the recipient was in this population. Section X of the Declaration includes these statutory conditions in the Declaration for clarity.

Section XI. Geographic Area

The Secretary must identify, for each Covered Countermeasure specified in the Declaration, the geographic area or areas for which liability immunity is in effect, including, as appropriate, whether the Declaration applies only to individuals physically present in the area or, in addition, applies to individuals who have a described connection to the area. Section XI of the Declaration provides that liability immunity is afforded for the administration or use of a Covered Countermeasure without geographic limitation. This could include claims related to administration or use in countries outside the U.S. It is possible that claims may arise in regard to administration or use of the Covered Countermeasures outside the U.S. that may be resolved under U.S. law.

In addition, the PREP Act specifies that liability immunity is afforded (1) to manufacturers and distributors without regard to whether the countermeasure is used by or administered to individuals in the geographic areas, and (2) to program planners and qualified persons when the countermeasure is either used or administered in the geographic areas or the program planner or qualified person reasonably could have believed the countermeasure was used or administered in the areas. Section XI of the Declaration includes these statutory conditions in the Declaration for clarity.

Section XII. Effective Time Period

The Secretary must identify, for each Covered Countermeasure, the period or periods during which liability immunity is in effect, designated by dates, milestones, or other description of events, including factors specified in the PREP Act. Section XII of the Declaration extends the effective period for different means of distribution of Covered Countermeasures through August 1, 2025.

Section XIII. Additional Time Period of Coverage

The Secretary must specify a date after the ending date of the effective time period of the Declaration that is reasonable for manufacturers to arrange for disposition of the Covered Countermeasure, including accepting returns of Covered Countermeasures, and for other Covered Persons to take appropriate actions to limit administration or use of the Covered Countermeasure. In addition, the PREP Act specifies that, for Covered Countermeasures that are subject to a Declaration at the time they are obtained for the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) under 42 U.S.C. 247d-6b(a), the effective period of the Declaration extends through the time the countermeasure is used or administered. Liability immunity under the provisions of the PREP Act and the conditions of the Declaration continue during these additional time periods. Thus, liability immunity is afforded during the “Effective Time Period,” described under Section XII of the Declaration, plus the “Additional Time Period” described under Section XIII of the Declaration.

Section XIII of the Declaration provides for 12 months as the Additional Time Period of coverage after expiration of the Declaration. Section XIII also explains the extended coverage that applies to any product obtained for the SNS during the effective period of the Declaration.

Section XIV. Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program

Section 319F-4 of the PHS Act, 42 U.S.C. 247d-6e, authorizes the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) to provide benefits to eligible individuals who sustain a serious physical injury or die as a direct result of the administration or use of a Covered Countermeasure. Compensation under the CICP for an injury directly caused by a Covered Countermeasure is based on the requirements set forth in this Declaration, the administrative rules for the Program, and the statute. To show direct causation between a Covered Countermeasure and a serious physical injury, the statute requires “compelling, reliable, valid, medical and scientific evidence.” The administrative rules for the Program further explain the necessary requirements for eligibility under the CICP. Please note that, by statute, requirements for compensation under the CICP may not align with the requirements for liability immunity provided under the PREP Act. Section XIV of the Declaration, “Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program,” explains the types of injury and standard of evidence needed to be considered for compensation under the CICP.

Further, the administrative rules for the CICP specify that if countermeasures are administered or used outside the United States, only otherwise eligible individuals at United States embassies, military installations abroad (such as military bases, ships, and camps) or at North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) installations (subject to the NATO Status of Forces Agreement) where American servicemen and servicewomen are stationed may be considered for CICP benefits. Other individuals outside the United States may not be eligible for CICP benefits.

Section XV. Amendments

Section XV of the Declaration confirms that the Secretary may amend any portion of this Declaration through publication in the Federal Register.

Declaration

Declaration for Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act Coverage for Countermeasures Against Marburgvirus and/or Marburg Disease

I. Determination of Public Health Emergency

42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(b)(1)

I have determined that Marburg disease and marburgviruses are a credible risk such that Marburg disease or marburgviruses may in the future constitute a public health emergency. This Declaration must be construed in accordance with the Advisory Opinions of the Office of the General Counsel (Advisory Opinions). I incorporate those Advisory Opinions as part of this Declaration.[1] This Declaration is a “requirement” under the PREP Act.

II. Factors Considered

42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(b)(6)

I have considered the desirability of encouraging the design, development, clinical testing, or investigation, manufacture, labeling, distribution, formulation, packaging, marketing, promotion, sale, purchase, donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration, licensing, and use of the Covered Countermeasures.

III. Recommended Activities

42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(b)(1)

I recommend, under the conditions stated in this Declaration, the manufacture, testing, development, distribution, administration, and use of the Covered Countermeasures.

IV. Liability Immunity

42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(a), 247d-6d(b)(1)

Liability immunity as prescribed in the PREP Act and conditions stated in this Declaration is in effect for the Recommended Activities described in Section III.

V. Covered Persons

42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(i)(2), (3), (4), (6), (8)(A) and (B)

Covered Persons who are afforded liability immunity under this Declaration are “manufacturers,” “distributors,” “program planners,” “qualified persons,” and their officials, agents, and employees, as those terms are defined in the PREP Act, and the United States. In addition, I have determined that the following additional persons are qualified persons: (a) Any person authorized in accordance with the public health and medical emergency response of the Authority Having Jurisdiction, as described in Section VII below, to prescribe, administer, deliver, distribute or dispense the Covered Countermeasures, and their officials, agents, employees, contractors and volunteers, following a Declaration of an emergency; (b) any person authorized to prescribe, administer, or dispense the Covered Countermeasures or who is otherwise authorized to perform an activity under an Emergency Use Authorization in accordance with Section 564 of the FD&C Act; and (c) any person authorized to prescribe, administer, or dispense Covered Countermeasures in accordance with Section 564A of the FD&C Act.

VI. Covered Countermeasures

42 U.S.C. 247d-6b(c)(1)(B), 42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(i)(1) and (7)

Covered Countermeasures are any antiviral, any other drug, any biologic, any diagnostic, any other device, or any vaccine, used to treat, diagnose, cure, prevent, or mitigate Marburg disease, or the transmission of marburgviruses or a virus mutating therefrom, or any device used in the administration of any such product, and all components and constituent materials of any such product, or countermeasures for adverse effects of these countermeasures, and countermeasures that otherwise limit the harm caused by the health threat.

Covered Countermeasures must be “qualified pandemic or epidemic products,” or “security countermeasures,” or drugs, biological products, respiratory protective devices or devices authorized for investigational or emergency use, as those terms are defined in the PREP Act, the FD&C Act, and the Public Health Service Act.

VII. Limitations on Distribution

42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(a)(5) and (b)(2)(E)

I have determined that liability immunity is afforded to Covered Persons only for Recommended Activities involving Covered Countermeasures that are related to:

(a) Present or future federal contracts, cooperative agreements, grants, other transactions, interagency agreements, memoranda of understanding, or other federal agreements; or

(b) Activities authorized in accordance with the public health and medical response of the Authority Having Jurisdiction to prescribe, administer, deliver, distribute or dispense the Covered Countermeasures following a Declaration of an emergency.

As used in this Declaration, the terms Authority Having Jurisdiction and Declaration of Emergency have the following meanings:

i. The Authority Having Jurisdiction means the public agency or its delegate that has legal responsibility and authority for responding to an incident, based on political or geographical (e.g., city, county, tribal, state, or federal boundary lines) or functional (e.g., law enforcement, public health) range or sphere of authority.

ii. A Declaration of Emergency means any Declaration by any authorized local, regional, state, or federal official of an emergency specific to events that indicate an immediate need to administer and use the Covered Countermeasures, with the exception of a federal Declaration in support of an Emergency Use Authorization under Section 564 of the FD&C Act unless such Declaration specifies otherwise;

I have also determined that, for governmental program planners only, liability immunity is afforded only to the extent such program planners obtain Covered Countermeasures through voluntary means, such as (1) donation; (2) commercial sale; (3) deployment of Covered Countermeasures from federal stockpiles; or (4) deployment of donated, purchased, or otherwise voluntarily obtained Covered Countermeasures from state, local, or private stockpiles.

VIII. Category of Disease, Health Condition, or Threat

42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(b)(2)(A)

The category of disease, health condition, or threat for which I recommend the administration or use of the Covered Countermeasures is Marburg disease caused by marburgviruses or virus mutating therefrom.

IX. Administration of Covered Countermeasures

42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(a)(2)(B)

Administration of the Covered Countermeasure means physical provision of the countermeasures to recipients, or activities and decisions directly relating to public and private delivery, distribution and dispensing of the countermeasures to recipients, management and operation of countermeasure programs, or management and operation of locations for purpose of distributing and dispensing countermeasures.

X. Population

42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(a)(4), 247d-6d(b)(2)(C)

The populations of individuals include any individual who uses or is administered the Covered Countermeasures in accordance with this Declaration.

Liability immunity is afforded to manufacturers and distributors without regard to whether the countermeasure is used by or administered to this population; liability immunity is afforded to program planners and qualified persons when the countermeasure is used by or administered to this population, or the program planner or qualified person reasonably could have believed the recipient was in this population.

XI. Geographic Area

42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(a)(4), 247d-6d(b)(2)(D)

Liability immunity is afforded for the administration or use of a Covered Countermeasure without geographic limitation.

Liability immunity is afforded to manufacturers and distributors without regard to whether the countermeasure is used by or administered in any designated geographic area; liability immunity is afforded to program planners and qualified persons when the countermeasure is used by or administered in any designated geographic area, or the program planner or qualified person reasonably could have believed the recipient was in that geographic area.

XII. Effective Time Period

42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(b)(2)(B)

Liability immunity for Covered Countermeasures through means of distribution, as identified in Section VII(a) of this Declaration, other than in accordance with the public health and medical response of the Authority Having Jurisdiction and extends through August 1, 2025.

Liability immunity for Covered Countermeasures administered and used in accordance with the public health and medical response of the Authority Having Jurisdiction begins with a Declaration and lasts through (1) the final day the emergency Declaration is in effect, or (2) August 1, 2025, whichever occurs first.

XIII. Additional Time Period of Coverage

42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(b)(3)(B) and (C)

I have determined that an additional 12 months of liability protection is reasonable to allow for the manufacturer(s) to arrange for disposition of the Covered Countermeasure, including return of the Covered Countermeasures to the manufacturer, and for Covered Persons to take such other actions as are appropriate to limit the administration or use of the Covered Countermeasures.

Covered Countermeasures obtained for the SNS during the effective period of this Declaration are covered through the date of administration or use pursuant to a distribution or release from the SNS.

XIV. Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program

42 U.S.C. 247d-6e

The PREP Act authorizes the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) to provide benefits to certain individuals or estates of individuals who sustain a covered serious physical injury as the direct result of the administration or use of the Covered Countermeasures, and benefits to certain survivors of individuals who die as a direct result of the administration or use of the Covered Countermeasures. The causal connection between the countermeasure and the serious physical injury must be supported by compelling, reliable, valid, medical and scientific evidence in order for the individual to be considered for compensation. The CICP is administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration, within the Department of Health and Human Services. Information about the CICP is available at the toll-free number 1-855-266-2427 or http://www.hrsa.gov/​cicp/​.

XV. Amendments

42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(b)(4)

Amendments to this Declaration will be published in the Federal Register, as warranted.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 247d-6d

Dated: December 2, 2020.

Alex M. Azar II,

Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.

Footnotes

1.  See, e.g., Advisory Opinion on the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act and the March 10, 2020 Declaration under the Act, Apr. 17, 2020, as Modified on May 19, 2020, available at https://www.hhs.gov/​guidance/​sites/​default/​files/​hhs-guidance-documents/​prep-act-advisory-opinion-hhs-ogc.pdf (last visited Nov. 24, 2020); Advisory Opinion 20-02 on the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act and the Secretary’s Declaration under the Act, May 19, 2020, available at https://www.hhs.gov/​guidance/​sites/​default/​files/​hhs-guidance-documents/​advisory-opinion-20-02-hhs-ogc-prep-act.pdf (last visited Nov. 24, 2020); Advisory Opinion 20-03 on the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act and the Secretary’s Declaration under the Act, Oct. 22, 2020, as Modified on Oct. 23, 2020, available at https://www.hhs.gov/​guidance/​sites/​default/​files/​hhs-guidance-documents/​AO3.1.2_​Updated_​FINAL_​SIGNED_​10.23.20.pdf (last visited Nov. 24, 2020); Advisory Opinion 20-04 on the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act and the Secretary’s Declaration under the Act, Oct. 22, 2020, as Modified on Oct. 23, 2020, available at https://www.hhs.gov/​guidance/​sites/​default/​files/​hhs-guidance-documents/​AO%204.2_​Updated_​FINAL_​SIGNED_​10.23.20.pdf (last visited Nov. 24, 2020). This is not to suggest that other PREP Act declarations should be construed in a manner contrary to the interpretation provided in the Advisory Opinions. Back to Citation

[FR Doc. 2020-26972 Filed 12-8-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-37-P

The European Journal of International Law on The far-reaching US proposals to amend the International Health Regulations at the upcoming 75th World Health Assembly: A call for attention

https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-far-reaching-us-proposals-to-amend-the-international-health-regulations-at-the-upcoming-75th-world-health-assembly-a-call-for-attention/

Global health talks clouded by conspiracy theories about pandemic treaty

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/05/22/wha-who-pandemic-treaty/

and the conspiracy theories from the European Journal of International Law say:

https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-far-reaching-us-proposals-to-amend-the-international-health-regulations-at-the-upcoming-75th-world-health-assembly-a-call-for-attention/

“The World Health Organization is due to Attempt a Power Grab” – This May 22-28, 2022 in Geneva, Switzerland, “a sophisticated diversion to confuse people and get them to ignore the AMENDMENTS to the INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS” (emphasis added)

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F7f3721a2-620e-44ad-9c70-5e97cbb2d1f8_617x969.jpeg
“The Pandemic treaty does not yet exist yet. It is being drafted and negotiated right now. Discussions regarding the Pandemic treaty are important but they are also part of a sophisticated diversion to confuse people and get them to ignore the immediate concern which is the Amendments to the IHR being considered by the World Health Assembly this May 22-28.
They are very likely to pass” unless the are strong protests of the public from all countries concerned.

Sudeck’s disease stage 1, or diabetic Charcot’sfoot stage 0? Case report and assessment of the diagnostic value of MRI

How many people have been affected by this diagnosis? In the US 200 000 people a year if not more and a similar situation can be found elsewhere in the world. More research is advisable to find out what percentage of these diagnoses are caused by the electromagnetic or ultrasonic fields, a variation of the Havana syndrome. How much suffering do people have to go through this debilitating condition and what cost does it represent to the health insurance industry?
Do we actually understand that we are legally committing crimes against humanity under the “Heaven’s Eye”?

There has been done the extensive research in this field, for example:
https://zoryglaser.com/zory-archives-date/

From Zory’s Archive – Dr. Magda Havas, PhD.

This picture shows the condition caused by the external radiation

A letter was sent to the Secretary of State for the Home Department

Dagmar Palmerova
……
130 00 Prague 3
The Czech Republic

1.5.2022

The Secretary of State for the Home Department
The Rt Hon Priti Patel MP
Home Office
2 Marsham Street
London
SWIP4DF
via the UK Embassy in Prague

Dear Home Secretary,

When politics start to predominate over the constitutions, created under the guidance of conscious beings who were able to foresee the whirligig of time, we get the opportunity to see what needs to be corrected to make them function as they were intended for the benefits of mankind.

The case of Mr. Julian Assange is at the moment in your hands and I believe that the enormous external political pressure gives you a very limited choice for your decision, if any at all.

As my case is closely related to Mr. Assange’s and I should be the one to face the US power structures, I would like to explain to you, that I am not a journalist nor a publisher, but he is and using the symbolic language that confuses both contributes to many negative forces that politically influence his court processes. The national security issues of our times cannot have precedence over free speech when serious breaches of human rights take place across the world. He represents that speech to the mainstream media who can communicate the truth only in symbols but are allowed to mention his name. The Royal Coat of Arms on the UK website reminded me of the ancient esoteric meaning ‘As Above So Below’. They are interconnected and any imbalances in one evoke the reactions in the other.

Never before have people had such a need for the universal wisdom as we have today. Mr. Assange published among others a collection of Intelligence documents from which the jargon of the esoteric domain could be detected. When the esoteric knowledge gets into the hands holding scientific power, that very power gets multiplied beyond comparison and if not guarded, it can literally enslave the whole of mankind.

We have reached such a point. Is it righteous and ethical want to keep the knowledge secret and inflict unspeakable suffering with it even on its own people, all that for the sake of national security?

Here the Royal Coat of Arms shall be a reminder to us of the world Above us. Perhaps that might be the role of women in the 21st century on Earth…?

Yours sincerely,

Dagmar Palmerova

Tom Bearden On Human Mind Control Experimentation

So who and when is finally going to illegalize one of the very sources of unimaginable hatred within the atmosphere that I witnessed? We are talking about reality, not sci-fi. If we do not do it, the Creator will

Tom Bearden On Human
Mind Control Experimentation
From Eleanor White eleanor@raven1.net From A. Tyner atyner@nimbus.ocis.temple.edu 6-19-1

Bearden, Tom, “Mind Control and EM Wave Polarization Transductions – Part I, II & III”   I typed this excerpt because it does not print out on one page. Originally published in Explore (Vol. 9, No. 4) 1999, page 8 of Part III of the article posted at: http://www.cheniere.org/explore%20articles/mind%20control3/p08.jpg     Potential U.S. Rogue Groups and Two Recent Examples   Meanwhile, rogue groups amongst Western clandestine mind control researchers will probably arise if they have not already done so. They will likely seek to increase their personal control and further isolate the programs from orthodox government review and from government and legislative control. They may even divert the research into highly illegal and unethical means, because it furthers their own rogue agendas. That is how clandestine U.S. government research can sometimes go sour, unless great care is exercised by the oversight committees in the House and the Senate.   Sometimes when rogue groups do gain control and total secrecy of a given new technological area, then what appears to be “U.S. government operations” do start to encompass a criminal and unethical operations (sic), hidden usually beneath the deep veil of high classification. Also, if it’s “scientific,” no one is ever brought to justice, even if the “evil science actions” are uncovered and publicly revealed.   We Certainly Have Proof of Such Rogue Activity. For Example, Here are Two Prominent Cases   1. For three decades, scientists from the U.S. government, universities, and civilian contractors secretly conspired to treat unsuspecting human patients with whole body nuclear radiation, including some retarded children and cancer patients. Some of those patients _ including some of the retarded children _ died as a result. These illegal experiments were conducted in great secrecy, and the results were highly classified. Eventually these actions were revealed, and a Presidential investigation committee investigated. These experiments would seem to be little different from the WWII Nazi and Japanese experiments on human prisoners. Are those U.S. scientists who were responsible for those retarded children’s deaths any different from the Nazi scientists and criminals we executed at Nuremberg? So what happened when this terrible thing finally came out into the open? President Clinton publicly apologized! How many of the responsible scientists were indicted for murder? Not one. None is every going to be.   Suppose a doctor here in South Alabama with his own private clinic had secretly irradiated those human patients and retarded children with whole body nuclear radiation, over a period of 30 years, resulting in some agonizing deaths. How many state and federal agencies would have come after him with arrest warrants? Probably about 50 or so. Would he have been indicted, tried, convicted, and executed or sent to prison for life? Absolutely! Would the President of the United States have apologized? Not on your life; he would have turned it over to the U.S. Attorney General with a strong directive to investigate and prosecute on criminal charges.   2. Again for three decades, scientists from (i) the U.S. Government, (ii) universities, and (iii) civilian contractors conspired to give poor syphilitic blacks in Tuskegee, Alabama a placebo while ostensibly treating them for syphilis. The purpose of the program was to deliberately observe and record the ravages of the disease to its fruition in their wracked bodies. So the scientists deliberately sat there and watched their brains rot and their bodies rot. They kept meticulous notes, of course. It was very scientific and it was macabre. They “treated” some 400 Blacks in the “program.” Over 100 blacks died as a result of those ghoulish experiments. So what happened when this gruesome thing was revealed? Again President Clinton publicly apologized. The head of the executive branch did not turn the macabre matter over to his Attorney General to prosecute. How many of these scientists were indicted? Not one. How many are going to be indicted? Not one. Suppose again this had been done by a private doctor in his own private clinic. You get the point.   There is No Punishment for Rogue Scientific Groups   Shockingly, the U.S. government at the highest level has shown (and these are not all such cases by any means!) that mass crimes against U.S. civilians, perpetrated by portions of the U.S. scientific community in direct conspiracy and in secret, will likely be condoned. The perpetrators will not be indicted, tried, or convicted. (emphasis in the original)   Note the connection of the “rogue groups” thesis to the above incidents. Note how rogue scientific groups got away with it in both these cases. There may be other rogue scientific groups getting away with such things today. They should not be able to get away with it. But they can.   Perhaps a most startling additional part of those two incidents is that there was no great public outcry from scientific community, deploring these murders and demanding that the criminal scientists be indicted and tried.   As the old saying goes, “By their silence they have convicted themselves.” The organized scientific community, as a community, has shown that it has little or no ethics, and _ while deploring any scientific murdering that “gets revealed,” _ is not really interested in justice. In short, much of the U.S. scientific community may now have very little ethics left. (emphasis in original)   We are not talking about normal individual science, but the Big Science community. There is a whale of a difference between the two. In the Big Science community, there can be and there are rogue groups. Lots of them. There is deep cover, deep classification. And there is very probably advanced mind control research and testing, be it legal or illegal. Hopefully, most of it is legal and constrained. However, some of it is almost certain to be illegal and ill constrained.   Human beings are still human beings. All the good and evil is still there, regardless of the group. The stage settings change, but the cast of characters and the play never change.   It’s sad, but ’twas ever thus. Hidden parts of our own governments _ and other governments throughout the world _ are no different from the old medieval groups, where nobles etc. were always plotting against the king, or using the king’s power for their own nefarious end. The rogue groups today are no different from all the scheming and conniving groups that destroyed the Roman Empire. Great empires fall from within, not usually from without! (emphasis in original)   Conclusion   …Let us hope this great new area, already off to a bad start, can be bridled and steered in the direction of helping and healing people, instead of killing or abusing them. The excesses in its bad use is a potent threat to all nations on Earth. Yet it can revolutionize medical science, education, communication, and psychology. Eventually it can engineer the mind and memory directly, beneficially…

MainPage
http://www.rense.com

Y.T. Wee Darwin’s Universe: Survival for Nothing Review

Darwin’s Universe: From Nothing, By Nothing and For Nothing. It’s Survival For Nothing! Evolution can only offer humans a meaningless existence.

Darwinists hope to bury God in an avalanche of a causeless universe and a godless evolution.

However, instead of liberating us, they plunge us into a cosmic depression. We are reduced to: From Nothing, By Nothing, For Nothing – an accidental leftover from the Big Bang, evolved by a lucky chance, and here for no ultimate purpose

We are just walking molecules, birthed through a cosmic accident, dancing to the music of our DNA, and destined to disappear in a cosmic blink – nothing more, nothing less, nothing else.

And when we look to science and evolution for answers, all we get is a blank look. Life has no real purpose, dude – it is about the survival of the genes in us – feeding, fending, fleeting and fathering – just live through it and get it over with. Our final destination is the hole in the ground.

But is it true?

Perhaps we are: From Someone, By Someone, For Someone. Perhaps there is an unexplored and awesome universe beyond the Darwinian world of survival for nothing.

Science encourages us to think critically and lets us place Darwinism in the crosshairs and examine it in the light of empirical science – is it observable and repeatable? If not, it is not experimental science. And, as we shall see, Darwinism is an unobservable and unreproducible pseudo-science.

This book will walk us through cosmology, biology, philosophy and end with theology, the queen of the sciences. Empirical science buries Darwinism and resurrects Creationism. We are more than cosmic orphans lost in an accidental, uncaring and dying Universe; we are living souls, made in the image of God, and designed to have a wonderful relationship with an awesome Creator.

Yan T Wee, the founding Pastor of Shalom Baptist Church, Singapore, writes from his fascinating research into the latest skirmish between speculative Darwinism and deducible Creationism. He concludes that Darwinism, when viewed in its entirety, is not only disingenuous, but a guaranteed, one-way ticket into the universe of ultimate meaninglessness and despair:
https://www.chick.com/products/item?stk=2038

Do actually militaries have the right to withhold the scientific information from humanity, that has been obtained by the publicly funded international Human Genome Project, in which participated many leading universities?
The consequences of such conduct are beyond the scope of their power. They have been asked many times to reveal this information, with no results. Yet this very information is necessary to any meaningful debates about how to conduct life on our planet and thus solve peacefully the burning issues.
So has not the time come to present the request to the international court?
Or have we reached the point where even the international court is just an extended arm of the military?


Global WAR-NING! Geoengineering Is Wrecking Our Planet and Humanity – Global Research

World leaders are meeting in Glasgow at COP-26. All eyes are now on “the imminent dangers of CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions”. The “climate emergency” is a timely instrument of propaganda used to distract people from questioning “the real crisis”, namely the Covid-19 “plandemic”.

Source: Global WAR-NING! Geoengineering Is Wrecking Our Planet and Humanity – Global Research

Moderna Asks F.d.a. to Authorize its Vaccine for Children Under 6

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/04/28/moderna-asks-fda-to-authorize-covid-vaccine-for-kids-under-6-years-old.html

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/moderna-seeks-1st-covid-shots-littlest-kids-84366263

The most psychopathic and megalomaniac governance of this planet in the history of all civilizations and the most brainwashed masses who do not even realize that.
Utterly depressing and I dare to say criminal to expose the CREATOR’s children to the plastic bag’s dictates and depart to the remote private islands. What a disgraceful deviation from The Ray of Creation!
Where are the conscious leaders? Do not tell me that this has been the wish of our MOST MOST HOLY SUN ABSOLUTE. Then I would know you are the fallen angels.

https://consortiumnews.com/2022/04/25/the-angry-arab-the-us-middle-east-elections/

One of the significant features of clouds is their polarization.
The realms high above the clouds have unity. Whoever really understands the essence of it and sets his/her priorities to find out as much as possible about these highest realms, for the good of all humanity, cannot possibly go wrong in the long run. And we are allowed to make genuine mistakes in direct proportions to the positions we stand. After all, they give us precious insights.