EU Institutions . . . .

Six years ago:

Stakeholder Dialogue Group on EMF:

On 20 February 2013, the European Commission held a workshop in Brussels on EMF 

“Workshop on Risk Communication – Electromagnetic Fields and Human Health”,
Brussels, 20 February 2013
Venue: Auditorium, Centre de Conférences Albert Borschette (CCAB), Room 4A
36 Rue Froissart, B-1040 Brussels
It should be widely read by anybody who is connected with  the process of decision making regarding the implementation of 5G. There is nothing more important for the whole planet than to stop this terrible and dangerous misuse of science for utterly egoistic aims and the political parties and their candidates  for the upcoming elections should be addressed about this issue.  If only people who can vote were interested in things that will affect them profoundly for the next generations….
I previously posted the analyses of 5G Deployment, requested by EP Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and published last month and there was a reference to the guidelines of ICNIRP:    https://wordpress.com/post/dagmarpalmerova.com/4735
“While the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) issues guidelines for limiting exposure to electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (EMF), and EU member states are subject to Council Recommendation 1999/519/EC which follows ICNIRP guidelines, the problem is that currently it is not possible to accurately simulate or measure 5G emissions in the real world. “
Astonishing indeed;  but an interesting connection is mentioned in  the above 2013 workshop, where the author addresses  practices of the international agencies, mentioning ICNIRP:

 In the face of fast-growing concerns and opposition in many Council of Europe member states, the response of top executives of electricity companies and mobile telephone operators is to deny that their industrial and commercial activities have any adverse effect on human health. At the hearing in Paris on 25 February 2011, the official representatives of French and European mobile telephone operators passionately argued that the official threshold values applicable in most countries in the world were adequate to protect human beings from the thermal effects of mobile telephones and that any biological effects, if these could be demonstrated, would not have any adverse effects on human health.

 To back up their argument, the experts quoted the scientific assessments carried out by associations such as the International Committee on Non-Ionisation Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), a small private NGO near Munich, or by official organisations: the World Health Organization, the European Commission and a number of national protection agencies. It appears that these European and national organisations or international bodies have based their thinking on the threshold values and recommendations advocated by the ICNIRP when that private association was set up near Munich at the beginning of the 1990s.

The rapporteur underlines in this context that it is most curious, to say the least, that the applicable official threshold values for limiting the health impact of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and high frequency waves were drawn up and proposed to international political institutions (WHO, European Commission, governments) by the ICNIRP, an NGO whose origin and structure are none too clear and which is furthermore suspected of having rather close links with the industries whose expansion is shaped by recommendations for maximum threshold values for the different frequencies of electromagnetic fields.

 If most governments and safety agencies have merely contented themselves with replicating and adopting the safety recommendations advocated by the ICNIRP, this has essentially been for two reasons:

– in order not to impede the expansion of these new technologies with their promise of economic growth, technological progress and job creation;

– and also because the political decision-makers unfortunately still have little involvement in matters of assessing technological risks for the environment and health.”

The website of ICNIRP offers several analyses and guidelines, mostly very politely and smoothly turning down any suggested connections between EMF/Wi-fi and health problems as insufficiently proven.  https://www.icnirp.org/cms/upload/publications/ICNIRPStatementEMF.pdf

https://www.icnirp.org/cms/upload/publications/ICNIRPemfgdl.pdf

The same usual story of all taboos.

So if I understand correctly, there is a planetary political and technological movement, whose leaders decided on behalf of the world, that they will expose 7 billion people and all its species to the electromagnetic radiation of such density and military  intensity that it cannot have but disastrous consequences in time  for the majority of them  and justify it by economic growth, convenience and the revolutionary idea of fridges talking to the toasters. Totally disregarding the scientific protests of such magnitude that if there was no military and financial power behind them, backed up by the main stream media censorship, the public anger would be so strong that it would stop them.  Maybe another 200 years if we last that long…..

 

EU Parlament: 5G Deployment

State of Play in Europe, USA and Asia

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2019/631060/IPOL_IDA(2019)631060_EN.pdf

Last month our EU Parliament’s  representatives  voted for filters and articles 11&13.   I have no doubts that with such study as the one above 5G deployment will take place, no matter what candidates will succeed in the upcoming Eu elections. The document has 32 pages with detailed political, technical, and economic analyses and among all surely important datas there is a  3 paragraph article called: ‘5G Electromagnetic Radiation and Safety’ :
Significant concern is emerging over the possible impact on health and safety arising from potentially
much higher exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation arising from 5G. Increased exposure may result not only from the use of much higher frequencies in 5G but also from the potential for the aggregation of different signals, their dynamic nature, and the complex interference effects that
may result, especially in dense urban areas.
The 5G radio emission fields are quite different to those of previous generations because of their complex beamformed transmissions in both directions – from base station to handset and for the return. Although fields are highly focused by beams, they vary rapidly with time and movement and so are unpredictable, as the signal levels and patterns interact as a closed loop system. This has yet to be mapped reliably for real situations, outside the laboratory.
IPOL | Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies
12 PE 631.060
While the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) issues guidelines for limiting exposure to electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (EMF), and EU member states are subject to Council Recommendation 1999/519/EC which follows ICNIRP guidelines, the problem is that currently it is not possible to accurately simulate or measure 5G emissions in the real world. “

That is all, would you believe…would not one expect postponing such planetary project, if we are unable to even simulate its emissions?  It is a lie of course, this technology was developed and tested by the Military  decades ago.  The current political aspect of deployment is a puzzle of its own, China seems to  favour the lowest GHz if I understood correctly from this study, which is sensible, but

1GHz= 1 000 000 000 Hz as one writer pointed out recently

and the Schumann resonance=7.83 Hz so what thoughts can possibly come to our minds? No butterflies in every sense.

NY Times are you serious? You should apologise to RT America

General public trusts whatever the ‘respected’  press or media present them so I would expect an obligation to do at least the basic research to eliminate the most screaming incongruities before publicly dismissing  all opposing research as invalid. That applies not just for 5 G but for the other taboo topics as well. When only  politics is concerned, one could not to give a damn, but if lives of all planetary species get affected, it is an entirely different story and misleading the public should be against the law for its possible global negative impact.  But obviously it is not, on the contrary, those who do not mislead the public are ostracised. So I urge everyone to put  these political US/RU slogans aside and read the following journal, which suggests, that Russian and American scientists have been exchanging their research for decades independently of politics and explains, how 5G will penetrate deep into your body via Brillouin precursors:

https://microwavenews.com/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/backissues/m-a02issue.pdf

via 2. https://scientists4wiredtech.com/what-are-4g-5g/brillouin-precursors/

via 1.https://www.activistpost.com/2019/05/5g-where-does-it-come-in-on-the-emf-spectrum.html

5G Telecommunications Science

Russian study 1977 – Biological effects of millimeter-wavelengths,  declassified by Cia in 2012:                                                                  https://mdsafetech.files.wordpress.com/2019/02/biological-effects-of-millimeter-wavelengths.-zalyubovskaya-declassif-by-cia-1977-biol-eff-mm-waves.pdf

 

 

 

Censorship and War

Ourgreaterdestiny silenced on WordPress May 11 2019

The Silencing 
2019

The well-researched, evidenced based facts in my Blog about these end times, and the war for man’s Soul, was silenced on May 11, 2019. http://ourgreaterdestiny.wordpress.com  

I am in the process of establishing my Blog with another host and will provide a link as soon as it is comlete.



December 21, 2012 was not the end, it was the beginning of another great cycle. Blocking the Sun is not about climate change, it’s about blocking man from his original Divine Blueprint.