Complaint Form

For communications under:

• Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
• Convention against Torture, or
• International Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination

Please indicate which of the above procedures you are invoking:
Convention against Torture…

Date:   …15.5. 2020……….

I.         Information on the complainant:

Name: …Palmerova……                               First name(s):  Dagmar    

Nationality:    Czech………                          Date and place of birth:     xxxx 1952 Prague……….

Address for correspondence on this complaint:         …xxxxxx  130 00 Prague   The Czech Republic…..

Submitting the communication:         

On behalf of all people of this planet being targeted with the psychotronic directed energy technologies. I do not have their authorization but they have all been exposed in various degrees to human experimentation via these technologies and they have the same aim – to stop their clandestine application on human beings.

II.        State concerned/Articles violated

It is a global issue, none of the states can officially acknowledge the use of directed energy technologies on civilians except Russia. Russia prohibited their application in 2001 by adopting the Article 6 of the Federal Law of Russia on Weapons: “Weapons and other items, damaging effect of which is based on the use of EM, light, thermal, infrasound radiation.”
NASA’s ‘Future Strategic Issues’ document from 2001 characterises directed energy technologies as ‘legal’.

Articles of the Covenant or Convention alleged to have been violated:

In accordance with article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Being Subjected to Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, adopted by the General Assembly on 9 December 1975,
these articles of Convention could be violated if the application of directed energy technologies were admitted:

-Article 1 Protection against torture or any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind,

-Article  16:
1. Each State Party shall undertake to prevent in any territory under its jurisdiction other acts of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment which do not amount to torture as defined in article I, when such acts are committed by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. In particular, the obligations contained in articles 10, 11, 12 and 13 shall apply with the substitution for references to torture of references to other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

-The additional articles may apply to individual cases like Mr. Julian Assange’s.

III.      Exhaustion of domestic remedies/Application to other international procedures

Steps taken by or on behalf of the alleged victims to obtain redress within the State concerned for the alleged violation – detail which procedures have been pursued, including recourse to the courts and other public authorities, which claims you have made, at which times, and with which outcomes:  …………………..

Within the last five years I wrote the letters to all relevant authorities in the Czech republic, in the US, in Australia, in the UK, in the Vatican and to the UN. Only OHCHR replied to me that the issue was not covered by the UN Treaty body. Please find the attached copies of several of them.

Have you submitted the same matter for examination under another procedure of international investigation or settlement (e.g. the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the European Court of Human Rights, or the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights)? 

I sent letters to the European Court of Human Rights and to the International Court of Justice (attached).
But I do not have any official documentation which could support my case. although there is innumerable evidence across the globe due to my 24/7 public surveillance and legal electronic hunt of my body. The government and the majority of citizens of the Czech Republic are the witnesses but without the authority and rights to speak about it directly, the rest use the legality of the hunt for their personal or professional gains.

If so, detail which procedure(s) have been, or are being, pursued, which claims you have made, at which times, and with which outcomes:   ditto

IV.       Facts of the complaint

Detail, in chronological order, the facts and circumstances of the alleged violations. Include all matters which may be relevant to the assessment and consideration of the particular case. Please explain how you consider that the facts and circumstances described violate your rights.

………………………….

The facts:
Science of 21^st century reached such a high level of cognition of the external world on a subatomic level, that it is able to manipulate and actually direct remotely every external form of being, be it a plant, insect, animal, a human being as well as the geological or atmospheric processes of Nature due to the interference with the natural electromagnetic field of the Earth.
The technologies used for such manipulation are called psychotronic and one of their functions is the amplification of man’s psychic energies by electronic devices. Their users can remotely modify the physical, psychological, emotional, and psychic behaviour of humans and animals by psychic means.
This very technology has been used by all governments under the name of ‘crowd control weapons’  (you used to call them ‘less-lethal weapons’ last century) for very obvious reasons, they allow control of variable lethality, they are very precise, cheap, invisible and accommodate asymmetric threat. What is grossly overlooked is their possible long-lasting psychological effects on the targets. 
With the arrival of ‘smart’ technologies, their application was introduced to the private sector and the new industry of mutual electronic hunting of civilians was added to the intel/defense neurological research.
Since 2010 I have been under the police and public 24/7 ‘residential surveillance in a designated location’ for crimes I committed in the past although not officially charged with any of them. The surveillance includes mind reading and psyop operations, visually and aurally accessible to the public as ‘live’ proof of the existence of such technology, which denies all human dignity,  usurps the power to control physiological and mental processes of other human beings on a large scale and reduces them to the states’ and public commodities. From the extensive literature of different neurological patents and from my own experience it can be assumed that there are many types of programs, some are more concentrated on the physiological aspects of human nature, others are purely psychological and if the subjects are found to be responsive to psychic energies, then the experimentation proceeds on this line as well.
It automatically anticipates the clandestine presence of the militaries’ micro/nanochips or sensors in the bodies of targeted people, yet such suggestions are diagnosed as delusional.

The governments, police, judiciary, and the medical establishment either want to or must pretend they have no knowledge of such technology being used on civilians in different degrees, therefore no international laws have been created to stop this breach of human liberty.

No one can deny  the most evident violation of the Nuremberg Codes:
     -the absence of informed consent to human experimentation,
     -coercion 
     – the absence of formulated scientific experimentation
and no one can disaffirm that in the principle a human body in the third millennium has been used the same way as the body of slaves in antiquity.

But I want to address the broader aspect of this matter, which needs to be considered.
OHCHR’s  Convention’s articles themselves do not reflect the anonymous remote electronic targeting, where it is virtually impossible to locate the attackers without access to satellites’ data. But even when they are actualized, it will not be sufficient because these technologies do not affect only a certain amount of selected people who have been microchipped and used for human experimentation or punished for exposing or investigating the controversial planetary issues. They have been increasingly incorporated into the various IT devices and applied across all sectors of human activities for lucrative businesses and total control of humanity through the digitalization of our bodies.
I understand that the social credit systems and coronavirus pandemics are the convenient ways to keep humanity under control, but they deprive us of free will to exercise the choices between yes and no, our fundamental inheritance from our CREATOR, granted to us for very specific purposes of perfecting of our being. Our disregard for them is futile and very naïve as we can never succeed in the long term, but we could attract our classical reciprocal destruction as is suggested in Revelations. It is like standing on the bridge and watching the ship approaching the iceberg and doing nothing to stop it.
My past has been used to prevent me from communication with other human beings, which I respect, but at the same time those who put me under the martial law are not willing to inform humanity about the most important facts of  the entire human existence and such secrecy only inhibits the urgently needed solutions.

1. There is exact scientific evidence to be found in the genetic material of species that humans do not originate from primates. Perhaps our mental retardation is so severe that we cannot admit to ourselves what our forefathers knew without having the genomes of species in their hands.
Such knowledge has always been accessible through the esoteric science, with the protective measures of psychological training that leads humanity to a higher state of consciousness and safeguards the knowledge from being exploited for egoistic and power-seeking aims. We took the inspiration from its science, discarded the protective measures in exactly the same manner as we did with the natural cell barriers, and ended up on the path of singularity, failing to understand the most fundamental objective principles on which the Universe is built.

2. Electricity is a sacred cosmic substance (allocated in definite quantities to every planet) that participates in the creation and the maintenance of life of all species in the entire Universe. Without such recognition, we have created electric technologies of which application often breaches the majority of human rights and unsustainably consumes this sacred substance, instead of introducing to humanity the sustainable objective self-governing principles that would eventually  “secure the blessings of liberty for all” living beings on the planet Earth.

3.The planet Earth is a star, another ancient ‘secret’, which ought to be revealed to humanity long ago to direct its path away from unconscious egoistic pursuit of power and immortality on the Time line and pursue the evolution of one’s being on the eternal line as the rest of the Universe  apparently endeavors.

4. The Universe has been created exactly according to the Ray of Creation, with the Most Holy SUN ABSOLUTE being its central system. I had a vision of it so I know that all genuine scriptures and fairy tales of the East and the West speak the truth in the languages and symbols of their time and geography and our orthodox science ought to re-connect the dots in a different ways and between its different fields to prove it scientifically.

For that, a ‘common’ language is needed for all parties concerned and such language is available through esoteric science, often greatly misunderstood and so rejected for many reasons by both orthodox science and religion, in sharp contrast to the military and defense departments of all superpowers, who have gained  superior knowledge through it.
I am aware that this information falls outside the scope of OHCHR, but the current global situation can give rise to unpredictable circumstances and I am unshakably convinced that whatever happens, this knowledge will help humanity to orientate themselves in the right direction and the UN should know about it. The esoteric knowledge will help to reinstall human rights on the solid bases of objective justice that will restrain jurisdiction from  persecuting   publishers and all who point to the matters of public interest  in contradiction with the political climate of the times.

Yours faithfully,

Dagmar Palmerova

A copy sent to the minister of the Czech Foreign Affairs