The military and weather and climate intervention

https://www.livescience.com/65698-defense-department-climate-change.html

86 million barrels/year 2016 for operational purposes means over 4 trillion dollars. If we add the cost/hour of hiring the military airplanes for the global coverage, a half of the approximate number of unregistered global flights, salaries of all pilots, insurances, the wages of the craft personnel, you will get an astronomical cost for something Nature was doing for free, with far less extreems and without polluting the planet, its atmosphere and habitat.

Globally:  A primer on weather and climate intervention for economists:

https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp7586.pdf 

To refresh the history- the UN opened The Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques for signature in May 1977..the UN made it clear that
intending to harm others through deliberate manipulation of the environmental processes by any state was an
unacceptable and inappropriate use of these emerging technologies.

That was 40 years ago.

Climatic Science in the hands of humans

Last year I wrote few words about the military background of our famous climate change https://dagmarpalmerova.com/2018/10/07/the-global-empires-new-clothes-alias-climate-change/#more-3380

It is a complicated and confusing issue for anybody, who wants to actually understand, what is really going on, yet the quickest and most sensible thing would be to turn one’s eyes up the sky and make one’s own observations. Unfortunately, it is still not the case, despite clearly visible geoengineering air activities across the whole globe.

We live in the scientific age and no one will dispute its validity, but there is a science which is based on the objective laws of the universe and science which is subjective and discovers the objective laws accidentally.

Climate change science is an example of the latter,  half of the scientists insist there is a change, the other half denies it, that itself excludes objectivity. ‘How can that be?’ should be the most basic question to be asked by all media and the public.

There is an available approach to look at it  from the opposite side of  the Ray of Creation (excerpt from Ouspensky ISOM):

climate change warming In Search of the Miraculous cut1

“The ‘ray of creation’ seems at the first glance to be a very elementary plan of the universe, but actually, as one studies it further, it becomes clear that with the help of this simple plan it is possible to bring into accord, and to make into a single whole, a multitude of various and conflicting philosophical as well as religious and scientific views of the world. The idea of the ray of creation belongs to ancient knowledge and many of the naive geocentric systems of the universe known to us are actually either incompetent expositions of the idea of the ray of creation or distortions of this idea due to literal understanding.

“It must be observed that the idea of the ray of creation and its growth from the Absolute contradicts some of the modem views, although not really scientific views. Take, for instance, the stage—sun, earth, moon. According to the usual understanding the moon is a cold, dead celestial body which was once like the earth, that is to say, it possessed internal heat and at a still earlier period was a molten mass like the sun. The earth, according to the usual views, was once like the sun, and is also gradually cooling down and, sooner or later, will become a frozen mass like the moon. It is usually supposed that the sun is also cooling down and that it will become, in time, similar to the earth and later on, to the moon.

“First of all, of course, it must be remarked that this view cannot be called ‘scientific’ in the strict sense of the term, because in science, that is, in astronomy, or rather, in astrophysics, there are many different and contradictory hypotheses and theories on the subject, none of which has any serious foundation. But this view is the one most widely spread and one which has become the view of the average man of modem times in regard to the world in which we live.

“The idea of the ray of creation and its growth from the Absolute contradicts these general views of our day.

“According to this idea the moon is still an unborn planet, one that is, so to speak, being born. It is becoming warm gradually and in time (given a favorable development of the ray of creation) it will become like the earth and have a satellite of its own, a new moon. A new link will have been added to the ray of creation. The earth, too, is not getting colder, it is getting warmer, and may in time become like the sun. We observe such a process for instance in the system of Jupiter, which is a sun for its satellites.

“Summing up all that has been said before about the ray of creation, from world 1 down to world 96, it must be added that the figures by which worlds are designated indicate the number of forces, or orders of laws, which govern the worlds in question. In the Absolute there is only one force and only one law—the single and independent will of the Absolute. In the next world there are three forces or three orders of laws. In the next there are six orders of laws; in the following one, twelve; and so on. In our world, that is, the earth, forty-eight orders of laws are operating to which we are subject and by which our whole life is governed. If we lived on the moon we should be subject to ninety-six orders of laws, that is, our life and activity would be still more mechanical and we should not have the possibilities of escape from mechanicalness that we now have.                                                                                                     

If I take this esoteric knowledge as another valid hypothesis, it would mean that warming of our planet is actually destined in the long run and not something to be stopped at the expense of the whole planet. Our Creator is not a sadist who would design the Universe in order to fry all his creatures in it and it is understood that humanity will have developed higher being bodies for such transformation. But we have not yet officially admitted that there is a Creator, which is quite remarkable considering the fact that scientists broke the genome of species and make our replicas, so that will not be accepted. Yet it could reconcile both camps at least on something, that there is a possibility of a naturally occurring warming of the earth.

The rest is not really pleasant at all, the superpowers’ own published materials confirm that they artificially manipulate the climatic processes of Nature and not just for the scientific purposes but for the military, political and economic control of the whole planet. There is no doubt about it at all, we are just in a totally insane situation, where the long list of patents supports the published materials yet the official approach to climate change persists. The presidents’ advisors keep using the carbon dioxide narrative and their successors laugh at it. Nothing can be done as is evident since Kyoto. The ecosystem suffers, the species are disappearing, clandestine directed energy technologies are altering not just life on earth but the space around the planet as well, nobody knows what consequences it will bring yet the silence is imperative.

A while ago I was explaining the map of this situation for quick orientation:  being a climate scientist means the sky is a primary subject of his/her investigation and it is literally impossible for him to miss what is happening up there,, but they are not allowed to talk about it publicly unless they are prepared to lose their positions, grants, families and get ostracised by media and society.

One way out of it is to concentrate on climate change topic (observation of weather patterns over a long period of time), by such way they elegantly avoid the weather change where the real problem resides, and by adding  CO2 pollution which certainly exists but does not cause weather change they succeed in misleading equally politicians and the public.

So it works like this:

A – scientists who say there is climate change-

B- scientists who say there is no climate change

A  is divided again into  A1 and A2:

The  A1  group follows government/military guidelines and strictly adheres to the climate change, sea levels, temperatures and the human influence since Adam.  It comes to the conclusion there is climate change caused by greenhouse gases mainly CO2. Their numerous studies about the climate change over long periods of time are granted by private and public institutions and published in prestigious scientific magazines and newspapers. The  A2 group is really concerned about the weather control and does not pretend the change is caused by Co2 which means they do not get any finances for scientific studies. Their voices are the ones we need to hear to know the truth, but they are not invited to the MSM clubs, one has to find them in the alternative media.

The second group B of NO climate change scientists is also divided into two subgroups B1 and B2.  B1 is an advocate of the coal mine industry and also uses only the historical analyses of climate weather patterns, which get published in scientific magazines, no words about the military and satellite technologies involvements, so actually, they support them  B2 are the scientists who refuse to play the game, who know that the moment global military stops its operations, the planetary weather will get back to ‘pre-weather control’ conditions and simply deny climate change, but by doing so they also deny the weather change.

Ironically B1 group is a strong hidden force which could support A2B2 if people were not so mechanical about the CO2 narrative.  The coal mine industry does create a mess but does not jeopardize globally the existence of species as the Military and satellite technologies do. But they might be solely interested  in money.                                                 I am not saying this is an exact picture of reality, but it helps me to quickly orientate myself in this controversial issue that has such an enormous impact on the planetary ecosystem and all countries be it large or small.

To those who have rather relaxed attitude to the catastrophic prognoses due to the fact they had not happened in the past, I would recommend to actively mentate over this picture and read the following articles. Then perhaps you will start to understand the complexity of the so called climate change, CO2 and 1-5 G technologies.

human-barrier-vlf_web_1024

https://www.sciencealert.com/nasa-space-probes-detect-a-human-made-barrier-shrouding-earth

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11214-017-0357-5

https://dagmarpalmerova.com/2018/05/25/planetary-emergency

 

INF Treaty violations

http://tass.com/defense/1041348

It is a man’s world not to enter, but when the existence of the planet is jeopardized by it, perhaps we should give a thought:

I googled the crucial  missile system, violating the INF treaty and selected Tass:

-The 9M729 cruise missile is a modernized version of the 9M728 that makes part of the Iskander-M tactical missile system. The new missile was developed by the Yekaterinburg-based Novator experimental design bureau.

-The United States claims that the 9M729 missile has a range capability that exceeds the 500 km limit stipulated by the INF Treaty and demands that Russia eliminates all these missiles, threatening to withdraw from the treaty

-Russia has numerously rejected these claims, saying that the new missile does not violate the INF Treaty with its range capability.

-“Only intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) launched from the Kapustin Yar proving ground had ranges greater than 500 kilometers,” chief of the Russian Missile and Artillery Force Lieutenant-General Mikhail Matveyevsky said.

-The United States suspected that 9M729 missiles had allegedly been launched from Kapustin Yar.

-In 2008-2014 a total of 100 missiles of different types were launched from that proving ground. “All surface-to-surface missiles launched there had ranges below the restrictions imposed by the INF Treaty. The launches of strategic missiles were the sole exception. Notifications of all of them were made to the United States under the 1982 treaty,”  said Matveyevsky.

-On January 15, Russia and the US held inter-agency consultations on the INF Treaty in Geneva. Washington again accused Moscow of breaching the arms control agreement. The US threatens to leave the treaty on February 2 unless Russia destroys its 9M729 missile, which allegedly violates the agreement

-Russia told colleagues that during the Zapad-2017 drills on September 18, 2017 this missile was test-launched at the Kapustin Yar proving ground at its maximum range and it covered less than 480 km.

So that is a Russian version. The American versions are mainly reduced to constating that Russia has clearly violated the treaty.

tps://www.armscontrol.org/act/2018-11/news/trump-withdraw-us-inf-treaty

As a reader I would expect the proof by stating the dates when 9M729 were launched and overreached 500 km. Until then  how do I know where is the truth?

 

 

 

 

 

 
More:
http://tass.com/defense/1041348

A letter to President of the Isu re Dew

figureskating dew w14.1.2019

The link not functional so the text is pasted  (not formatted)

14.1.2019

Mr. Jan Dijkema

President of the ISU

Avenue Juste-Olivier 17

1006 Lausanne

Switzerland

Re: Use of directed energy weapons in figure skating championships

Dear Mr. President,

The upcoming season of 2019 European and World Figure Skating Championships evokes last year’s memories from PyeongChang and Milan. In both events there were remotely operated directed energy weapons used against the figure skaters, which in a fraction of a second can create imbalance in the body, sufficient enough to cause a fall.  It is totally unnoticeable to the audiences, but the skaters themselves know that something was not correct, only do not understand how that could  happen and their coaches  perhaps know, but probably chose not to say anything.  Apart from affecting the body physically they can target the psychological or emotional  state of a competitor.  We are talking about very serious crimes against humanity, which have been happening to the degree of torture for decades, secretly performed on activists, adversaries to the global defence departments and even on selected unsuspecting public. But now it seems to be spreading into all areas of social, cultural and sport activities where global mafia is allowed to stir public emotions and exploit people’s incognisance for entertainment and  financial or political purposes. There have been hundreds of petitions sent to the heads of the states, to the militaries, to Pentagon, to Nato, to EU, asking to stop using directed energy weapons:  utter silence has followed on all sides.

I know this because I have been such a target myself for many years and as a life long admirer of figure skating I perceive many things  which can be overlooked.

I was literally horrified after Milan; to sustain the top level performance one has to devote himself totally to such aim from the beginning of  his childhood and suddenly certain illegitimate  power decides to destroy all, without risking to be exposed as happens in cases of taking drugs.  This is a global issue you cannot solve but there might be some way to protect the sport events by shielding the competitors from the electromagnetic, sonic, microwave and other radiation. I strongly recommend that you- as the organizers-  address this danger to the defence departments of Belorussia and Japan and perhaps to their  technical scientific centres, who have access to the newest scientific gadgets. Please understand that the level of our technology is presently such that the ice skater can be attacked not just from a satellite but even from a smart phone by anybody anywhere at a sport stadium and if that happened successfully before, there is no reason not repeat it again.  Were I a parent, I would wholeheartedly discourage my child from sacrificing his/her life for top sports under such circumstances.

We have entered into an era of human history where (for us new) universal laws are in operation and until we recognize and respect them, our future is not something to look forward to.

The International Skating Union belongs among the oldest sport federations on our planet, please try to  protect the sport from such irresponsibly applied technologies.

Yours sincerely,

Dagmar Palmerova

Copies sent to:

Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Belarusian Union of Skaters

Japan Skating Federation

The Belarusia Ambassador to Prague

The China Ambassador to Prague

The Japanese Ambassador to Prague

The Russian Ambassador to Prague

The US Ambassador to Prague

“We are energy inside the physical body”

That was recorded 5 years ago, in the mean time she passed away due to ever clandestine dew, vaccinations have still been compulsory in majority of the world and people in general still have no idea despite the alternative media’s rage, 5G is just about to wrap the whole planet into the radiation field suppressing reproduction cycles of all living irreversibly according to the animal studies (unless we all get yellow vests and say unisono NO which we will not), we still chew the Climate change CO2 bone and the orthodox science is hooked on virtual trips of ai, so really only the top military and b/w magicians know…and they keep silent…and we seem to connect dots in so many different ways that we lose the horizon….

U.S. Navy to release genetically engineered organisms into the ocean, unleashing mass genetic pollution with devastating consequences

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-12-11-navy-to-unleash-genetically-engineered-organisms-in-the-ocean.html

Source: U.S. Navy to release genetically engineered organisms into the ocean, unleashing mass genetic pollution with devastating consequences

Following the sources of the article I wanted to know, how many submarines we are actually talking about:  4 fully operational,  (dispute if all 4 actually  active) and signs of another 4 in construction to achieve the plan of 8. Who else can afford more submarines and who can afford a submarine at all? Besides everything existing, not just organic but inorganic as well  is detectable by sonic technologies and other directed energy facilities. So do we really have to genetically pollute  the planet’s oceans  basically with some form of  Morgellons? Should not those  on the social credits be scientists and the military first of all? Their thinking processes are quite revelational to the aims they have in their minds.

Ai has already been weaponized

https://phys.org/news/2018-09-hard-international-agreement-killer-robots.html

https://phys.org/news/2018-09-ai-weaponised-killer-robots.html

The killer robots- the most savage, barbaric, primitive repugnant idea from obviously subhuman, unconscious mind. To pass killing of humans into the hands of machines degrades us far below the level of machines, us, the original hope of our common CREATOR. What a cosmic disgrace.

ause there are far more attractive things to do.

 

 

Science against EMR to be supported by the public

Two lists  of scientists against the Electromagnetic Radiation. The first one was initially submitted on May 11, 2015  to

His Excellency Antonio Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations;
Honorable Dr.Tedros Adhonom, Director-General of the World Health Organization;
Honorable Achim Steiner, Executive Director of the U.N. Environmental Programme;
U.N. Member Nations          

https://emfscientist.org/images/docs/International_EMF_Scientist-Appeal.pdf

The second one is International appeal STOP 5G on Earth and in Space addressed to the United Nations, the World Health Organization, EU, Council of Europe and Governments of all Nations. It can be supported and signed  by the public:  

 https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal     

via https://www.activistpost.com/2018/11/5g-epidemic-to-hit-sacramento-also-los-angeles-houston-indianapolis.html

Hypersonics – the ‘latest’ toy for the public

https://www.newsweek.com/what-are-hypersonic-weapons-and-why-darpa-so-concerned-about-stopping-them-1212892

When I read the word “adversaries” I really wonder. In the 21 century are Europeans, Chinese and Russians adversaries? The whole planet as a matter of fact? Or do we have to accept that certain part of humanity needs to fight at any cost to the ecology and habitats of the planet regardless of what the rest of us, 7 billion people, think?

With the hypersonics we are talking about thousands of km/h, if we survive to the next fashion of megahypermagnetics we will still be caught up in the MATRIX. Humanity never learns.

“Whatever speed they may attain with this machine of theirs all the same. If they remain as they are not only they themselves but even their thought will never go any further than their atmosphere”

BT II book p.301 1950

 

 

 

 

 

 

International Appeal and Petition STOP 5G ON EARTH AND IN THE SPACE This needs a planetary response

https://www.activistpost.com/2018/11/international-appeal-and-petition-stop-5g-on-earth-and-in-space.html

The Petition:

https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal

I read the petition and had tears in my eyes.  If we are moved by somebody wanting to save whales and we get million signatures in a few days, this is a petition created by scientists who want to save not just whales but the whole life on Earth.  The industry has trillions of dollars on hand to push the project through on federal levels.  THIS NEEDS A PLANETARY RESPONSE ON A MASSIVE SCALE.

 

Psychotronic weapon and crime

Printout of the English text of the interview – https://1drv.ms/w/s!AiyVZbRRuwZmgQSs13R4XadJxgsD

https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=6606BB51B465952C!132&ithint=file%2cdocx&app=Word&authkey=!AKzXdHhdp0nGCwM
Презентация Ворошилова С.Я., представленная в интервью Галины Лозовицкой – https://1drv.ms/p/s!AiyVZbRRuwZmdTT9t-Jxv-jtIGA
В ВК опубликовано по ссылке: https://vk.com/video358048210_456239105

Pause
-32:15
Additional Visual Settings

Enter Watch And ScrollClick to enlarge

Unmute

286 Views

Great Barrier Reef

The outer Great Barrier Reef was a  wonderland on Earth for me so I take its dying personally. Last week I found a coral reef in the northern Red Sea, untouched by the rising temperature, so it alerted me to think about the intelligence of Nature, providing all its biological systems with mechanisms to adapt to the fluctuating temperatures. Why are some regions of corals affected and others not?  Global military technologies?

Today I watched the video Murder by Emoji – The Digital Killing Fields and the experiment with the lizard made me look at the military  bases in Queensland.

There are two of them, right next to the Great Barrier Reef:

Hmas in Cairns – Royal Australian Navy base  (all an activity off North Eastern Au            Raaf Base in Townsville- Royal Australian Air Force

Associative thinking.

https://qz.com/1255429/despite-rising-temperatures-coral-reefs-in-the-northern-red-sea-arent-bleaching/

Fish swim past a reef in the Red Sea in Dahabkk

Image result for map of queensland australia

 

 

 

Letter to the warmachine

Oct 20, 2018, 10:22 PM (4 days ago)
to letterstothewarmachine@gmail.com

Why I oppose the war machine

My letter to the Pentagon

We have been killing each other for millennia but at least we were facing each other when doing that. Now we use our intelligence and psychotronic science to perform the killing tasks secretly, cowardly, using even the planet itself as a weapon so no human law can catch us. There are exceptions–in those cases we chop the bodies into pieces on cameras at the embassies to send the clear message to the whole planet  as a warning– “L’état c’est moi”. Kali yuga mentality.

But the planet moved out of Kali into Dwapara Yuga stage. The stage where humans understand the principle of 5 electricities of which the physical world is composed and will be heading to the next stage of understanding the divine magnetism…

Reciprocal destruction creates the lowest vibrations on our planet and prevents humans from reaching the higher realms of high speed vibrations. What is so difficult to understand? Pure physics.  Even our ancestors knew about it – “ Inter arma silent musae”. War machine is obviously an unconscious, emotional cripple. Do we need you as leaders of this once beautiful planet?

NO.

Video: US Nuclear Missiles Deployed in Italy, … against Russia

Source: Video: US Nuclear Missiles Deployed in Italy, … against Russia

 

https://defensemaven.io/warriormaven/air/new-air-force-b-2-earth-penetrating-nuclear-weapon-changes-combat-strategy-aojDm8rPqkqIcmMmzEegDg/

What they are basically saying is- forget about the environment, we are in a star war game for which we need to have the atmosphere conductive. Get along with it or we will vaporise you.

The Global Empire’s new clothes alias Climate Change.

Good thing is that there are Government owned scientific  documents clearly stating the existence of Directed Energy Weapons Systems  on a global scale, whose operations are dependent on the specific weather conditions. Control of the weather seems to be  an inseparable part of the US/ Nato military conduct .

Bad thing is that nobody reads such documents so directed energy weapons are still considered the products of delusional minds, despite the fact that every smart phone is a directed energy weapon and is used extensively on millions of civilians by other millions of their fellow piggy beings.  Continue reading “The Global Empire’s new clothes alias Climate Change.”

40 years later in ants hives as predicted

There is a question, implied from the teaching of the 4th Way:

We, humanity have certain cosmic duties to fulfill which are not negotiable.

We have to radiate certain required vibrations for Nature and we can do it in two ways, either by killing each other and everything living as we have been doing so far or by meditating.* In other words by quantity of radiations or by their quality. Reflected in the population levels of the planet.

Which one do you prefer?

*The 1931 Manuscript of BT G.I.G

 

 

 

Nanotechnology and the International Law of Weaponry

via Project Camelot

and there have not been officially disclosed  Directed Energy Weapons yet. Better and better.

The point is, even if you create in the next decades  international laws, how will those laws be implemented?  How will I prove that I was shot with somebody’s smart phone? It was incomprehensible to my mind that the democratic, well educated western society would create a lethal weapon in the form of a mobile phone and give it to the world population with permission to torture and kill. Yes, kill, we are not killed only because of the reduced intensity of a signal. Otherwise majority of hunters would not give it a second thought.

Just a simple look at the military research evokes doubts about the state of their minds. The world is in hands of the scientists, who are competing with each other in who has the sickest and the most evil imagination on the planet and you are financing it, although you know they use civilians as their guinea pigs.  Well nanoweapons have a direct access to the whole body without using smart phones, they are in our food, water, in the air we breath and we have no idea how, when and by what/whom they could be activated.

Again, no international protective laws exist to this day.

nanoweapons_int_law_0

 

Human made barrier

main article image
(NASA)

There’s a Detectable Human-Made Barrier Surrounding Earth

We are changing space itself.

BEC CREW
5 APR 2018

In 2017, NASA space probes detected a massive, human-made ‘barrier’ surrounding Earth.

And tests have confirmed that it’s actually having an effect on space weather far beyond our planet’s atmosphere.

But the good news is that unlike our influence on the planet itself, that humongous bubble we created out in space is actually working in our favour.

Back in 2012, NASA launched two space probes to work in tandem with each other as they whizzed through Earth’s Van Allen Belts at speeds of around 3,200 km/h (2,000 mph).

Our planet is surrounded by two such radiation belts (and a temporary third one) – the inner belt stretches from around 640 to 9,600 km (400 to 6,000 miles) above Earth’s surface, while the outer belt occupies an altitude of roughly 13,500 to 58,000 km (8,400 to 36,000 miles).

Continue reading “Human made barrier”

They all speak English yet they do not understand each other.

When addressing the Climate Change, do they have in mind the Weather Market, Weather warfare, Military Plasma Experiments, Scalar technologies, the Weaponized Space Fence, Metal/Bio/Chemical ring around the Equator…? If abolishing all that will we still have the Climate Change? The current msm reporting is utterly useless, just fiddling with time before the EVENT arrives. A gross insult to even the lowest level of human intelligence.

How come? An old “wisdom” – you have to cover only small lies, nobody believes the big ones.