February 20, 2024

President Joe Biden
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President,

Today and tomorrow, the extradition of Mr. Julian Assange to the United States of America will be discussed in the United Kingdom’s court. Any normal-thinking being would say that 14 years of imprisonment without sunlight is a long enough sentence for journalists and publishers for publishing information that was and more than ever still is in the interest of all humanity. Since this is clearly a political case, which is not subject to extradition under the agreement between the United States and the United Kingdom, and at the same time contains absurd allegations of nearly two dozen violations of the antiquated US counter-espionage law, which correspond to my case, one cannot help but assume that his case is being misused as a proxy for mine and that is utterly unethical and unjust considering my numerous character failures being ascribed to him.
At my age, with all that I have been through consciously or unconsciously, I am able to stand up to your country and its judges and clear up all the misunderstandings that have been caused by the one-sided expedient interpretations of my life that your defense department provided in a seemingly unlawful recording to the whole world.
I always repeat that with my sinful past, I will definitely not play the role of a defender of my human rights, but when I see how an innocent person is imprisoned on my account and how esoteric knowledge got into the hands of the law that patented it, secreted it, privatized it, misused it against humanity, has not correctly understood its inner dimensions and is enriching himself financially with it at the expense of the suffering of many millions of people all over the planet, I raise my voice against this. My native country, basing itself on its sovereignty, awaits orders from the United States on how to treat its citizen. Mr. Julian Assange is in a similar position, and the democratic West is outraged by the “murder” of Mr. Navalny.
My case lies at the crossroads of many complicated problems, which seem impossible to solve separately because they are more or less connected or mutually conditioned.
However, the United States and the United Kingdom have several legal alternatives to avoid the requested extradition of Mr. Julian Assange. Why choose instead a legally questionable option that will go down in the history of your countries as one of the most shameful? Because of what? Why create more and more karmic debts on the threshold of a new age for humanity and the planet itself?
“Righteousness and judgment basis of throne of you, kindness and truth they are preceding face of you” Psalm 89:14

Most respectfully,

Dagmar Palmerova
Dolni Brezany
The Czech Republic

“Many years ago I read a volume of sermons by an English clergyman. I only remember one short one on prayer, and of that I can recall only two statements. He said that in all the rope used by the British Navy a red thread was woven, adding that through all our prayers must run the red thread of surrender to the will of God. Above all our own wishes must stand the wish that God’s will should prevail. His kingdom come, His will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.
What a vision of peace this opens up before the eyes of the soul!”
              From God Alone by Sri Gyanamata

What opens the vision of peace before the eyes of the global military?
With all their mastery in the Greek tragedies, they do not seem to comprehend that the kingdoms on earth originally represented the Kingdom of GOD and the kingdom’s army represented HIS Heavenly Army.
Joshua’s story is a direct testimony of that.
I thought the black theatre around my case was a way to acknowledge HIS EXISTENCE. I am reminding everyone again that if they know there is GOD (and the top space armies certainly know that) and hide the scientific proof from humanity, they are sinning against the Holy Spirit and that is the only thing that is not forgiven.
This new year should be used to inform humanity about the most important facts of its existence that are eternal, verified by different cultures of different nations of different ages. Hiding such revelations only contributes to the rise of many false conspiracy theories and fears, based on the wrong understanding of esoteric knowledge that is hidden behind the different solution-driven concepts of planetary scale people do not understand. How can they distinguish what is right or wrong?

Dear wizards,
that was very low. There was an agreement I would pay it back. And I was paying it off with the extra work until circumstances made it impossible. After all, did I not pay for it at the end through your “educational purposes”?
The ‘unconscious’ aspect of it I leave to the universal justice, it knows the best.
Of all vices of mine, money issue is the least to worry about.

nic jiného. Upřímný úsměv je obvykle projevem vřelého přátelství, které činí atmosféru srdečnější, ne tak těžkou, hustou, že by se dala krájet. A raději pár úsměvů navíc, než práskání bičem v manéži. Když někdo není schopen rozlišit motiv úsměvu, tak by se možná měl zdržovat kritických komentářů, ale zdá se, že je to předehra k dalšímu dějství operety, kde nejen zpěv, ale i úsměv bude povolován, nebo naopak předepisován jen ve zcela specifických situacích.

Co se týče cizího jazyka, dříve narozené generace neměly tu výsadu učit se cizí jazyky od mateřských škol s rodilými mluvčímí či jezdit na studia do zahraničí. Když člověk reprezentuje svůj stát na mezinárodním fóru, tak obvykle používá svůj rodný jazyk a tištěný projev, jak slýchávám při zasedáních OSN či Evropské unie, kde jsou všechny jazyky v rovnoprávném postavení a projevy jsou běžně tlumočeny.
Když někdo “mluví spatra” nebo intelem, tak má samozřejmě výhodu, ale když ne, nic se neděje. Vezme si prostě tlumočníka. Pokud máte lidem co říci, forma není až tak důležitá, obsah je podstatný. A když něčemu nerozumíte, tak se prostě zeptáte, aby vám to vysvětlili a jestli nemohou, asi nepůjde o nic důležitého..

The current General Assembly of the UN is warning the world of Russia’s so-called aggression. The news from both sides of the conflict opposes each other or describes the same problems on both sides, which is not addressed in a fair way to the international community.
Russia is pointing out that we are dealing with the effects, but ignoring their causes, which is true.
And if you are aiming to attack the world, would not your military budget and industry increase, not decrease?

And the agriculture resort would hardly be a primary interest :
https://www.rt.com/business/583188-russia-agriculture-budget-income/
That rather signifies a peaceful geopolitical outlook to me.

So what is going on? What shows are you playing as a substitute for the truth?
One is about the rights of the world’s species to choose their identity contrary to Nature’s origins and the other is about the unprecedented planetary violation of human rights that is connected with humanity’s scientific advances, misused first by the defense departments and then, being passed down to the private sector, by mafia for gladiator’s plays. All that under the observing eye of the intel agencies.
It distracts public attention from the danger of psychotronic technologies described by Mr. Kucinich in H.R. 2977 (October 2, 2001). To this day, only vaguely admitted as Havana syndrome. The same year, contrary to the Nato countries, Russia admitted their existence and prohibited their use on civilians. But 20 years ago we did not have smart technologies, where a little boy could touch the phone button and electronically rape his grandma on the other side of the planet or kill a friend for fun. Free of charge.
Such technologies have been used freely in every country of the world, including Ukraine.
They will not go away, only get more and more sophisticated, and we are not prepared for them politically, legally, and spiritually. Who is going to deal with it? The UN is not allowed to do that, it is not financially independent, and there is a conflict of interests, therefore it does not have needed respect (its recommendations are ignored, and its attendance is casual or even selectively prohibited.
How can be planetary issues dealt with effectively? Not to mention the other taboos.