The current General Assembly of the UN is warning the world of Russia’s so-called aggression. The news from both sides of the conflict opposes each other or describes the same problems on both sides, which is not addressed in a fair way to the international community.
Russia is pointing out that we are dealing with the effects, but ignoring their causes, which is true.
And if you are aiming to attack the world, would not your military budget and industry increase, not decrease?

And the agriculture resort would hardly be a primary interest :
https://www.rt.com/business/583188-russia-agriculture-budget-income/
That rather signifies a peaceful geopolitical outlook to me.

So what is going on? What shows are you playing as a substitute for the truth?
One is about the rights of the world’s species to choose their identity contrary to Nature’s origins and the other is about the unprecedented planetary violation of human rights that is connected with humanity’s scientific advances, misused first by the defense departments and then, being passed down to the private sector, by mafia for gladiator’s plays. All that under the observing eye of the intel agencies.
It distracts public attention from the danger of psychotronic technologies described by Mr. Kucinich in H.R. 2977 (October 2, 2001). To this day, only vaguely admitted as Havana syndrome. The same year, contrary to the Nato countries, Russia admitted their existence and prohibited their use on civilians. But 20 years ago we did not have smart technologies, where a little boy could touch the phone button and electronically rape his grandma on the other side of the planet or kill a friend for fun. Free of charge.
Such technologies have been used freely in every country of the world, including Ukraine.
They will not go away, only get more and more sophisticated, and we are not prepared for them politically, legally, and spiritually. Who is going to deal with it? The UN is not allowed to do that, it is not financially independent, and there is a conflict of interests, therefore it does not have needed respect (its recommendations are ignored, and its attendance is casual or even selectively prohibited.
How can be planetary issues dealt with effectively? Not to mention the other taboos.